From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mchehab@osg.samsung.com (Mauro Carvalho Chehab) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 15:12:48 -0200 Subject: [PATCH] arm: omap2: rx51-peripherals: fix build warning In-Reply-To: <20141204170353.GK18045@saruman> References: <1417033655-32332-1-git-send-email-balbi@ti.com> <20141204152411.GF18045@saruman> <3261416.DL88JFJXUF@wuerfel> <20141204154835.GH18045@saruman> <20141204163930.GF2817@atomide.com> <20141204150012.2fb75907@recife.lan> <20141204170353.GK18045@saruman> Message-ID: <20141204151248.7f41afe0@recife.lan> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Em Thu, 04 Dec 2014 11:03:53 -0600 Felipe Balbi escreveu: > Hi, > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 03:00:12PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Em Thu, 04 Dec 2014 08:39:31 -0800 > > Tony Lindgren escreveu: > > > > > * Felipe Balbi [141204 07:50]: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 04:41:13PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > On Thursday 04 December 2014 09:24:11 Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 02:27:35PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > > > > > commit 68a3c04 ([media] ARM: OMAP2: RX-51: update > > > > > > > si4713 platform data) updated board-rx51-peripherals.c > > > > > > > so that si4713 could be easily used on DT boot, but > > > > > > > it ended up introducing a build warning whenever > > > > > > > si4713 isn't enabled. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This patches fixes that warning: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c:1000:36: warning: \ > > > > > > > ?rx51_si4713_platform_data? defined but not used [-Wunused-variable] > > > > > > > static struct si4713_platform_data rx51_si4713_platform_data = { > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Sebastian Reichel > > > > > > > Cc: Tony Lindgren > > > > > > > Cc: Hans Verkuil > > > > > > > Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi > > > > > > > > > > > > a gentle reminder on this one. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me add my > > > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann > > > > > > > > > > You didn't say who you expect to pick up the patch. I assume Mauro > > > > > > > > patch author now decides who takes the patch ? That's new :-) > > > > Well, for patches that cross subsystem boundaries, like this one, > > the best is to give a hint about whom you expect to pick it. > > > > In this specific case, as commit 68a3c04 is in my tree, the best is > > to merge the patch on it, as the patch may not even apply at Tony's > > tree. > > pointing to the commit that caused the problem really isn't enough ? The > commit short description (which is also on my commit log) clearly > mentions "[media]". > > Anyway, I'll do that next time. Ah, and please c/c linux-media ML next time, as I use patchwork there to track patches for the media tree. Thanks, Mauro.