From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] i2c: rk3x: fix bug that cause measured high_ns doesn't meet I2C spec
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 19:40:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141204184046.GL7944@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=X5inPWZakhgDX0dX=1CWXygEi3_AH9FVFWXYT3LZA5bg@mail.gmail.com>
> If you don't read all the below, my belief is that we should simply
> rename the strings in Addy's patch. We should change "rise-ns" to
> "i2c-scl-rising-time" and "fall-ns" to "i2c-scl-falling-time".
> Wolfram: can you confirm this is OK? I'm voting to leave the "-ns"
> off the end of both to avoid asymmetry.
New binding should have the "-ns" suffix, right? So, I'd vote to add the
suffix to the new bindings and deprecate the ones used in the designware
driver: "i2c-scl-rising-time-ns" and "i2c-scl-falling-time-ns"
It might be a little more work now, but it will help us in the future,
because it is the correct way to do it.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20141204/f3578831/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-04 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-06 8:11 [PATCH] i2c: rk3x: fix bug that cause measured high_ns doesn't meet I2C spec Addy Ke
2014-12-02 23:02 ` Doug Anderson
2014-12-03 2:37 ` [PATCH v2] " Addy Ke
2014-12-03 5:13 ` Doug Anderson
2014-12-03 11:15 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-12-03 17:53 ` Doug Anderson
2014-12-04 18:40 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2014-12-04 18:43 ` Doug Anderson
2014-12-04 19:03 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-12-05 19:31 ` Doug Anderson
2014-12-08 2:59 ` [PATCH v3] " Addy Ke
2014-12-08 3:06 ` addy ke
2014-12-08 8:52 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-12-08 17:13 ` Doug Anderson
2014-12-08 17:34 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-12-08 18:53 ` Doug Anderson
2014-12-08 20:04 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-12-11 6:00 ` [PATCH v4] i2c: rk3x: fix bug that cause measured high_ns doesn't meet I2C specification Addy Ke
2014-12-11 7:47 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-12-11 11:02 ` [PATCH v5] " Addy Ke
2014-12-11 19:22 ` Doug Anderson
2015-01-13 11:42 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141204184046.GL7944@katana \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox