From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 20:03:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2] i2c: rk3x: fix bug that cause measured high_ns doesn't meet I2C spec In-Reply-To: References: <1415261514-4051-1-git-send-email-addy.ke@rock-chips.com> <1417574237-4328-1-git-send-email-addy.ke@rock-chips.com> <20141203111518.GB1039@katana> <20141204184046.GL7944@katana> Message-ID: <20141204190342.GM7944@katana> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > > New binding should have the "-ns" suffix, right? So, I'd vote to add the > > suffix to the new bindings and deprecate the ones used in the designware > > driver: "i2c-scl-rising-time-ns" and "i2c-scl-falling-time-ns" > > > > It might be a little more work now, but it will help us in the future, > > because it is the correct way to do it. > > OK, that sounds fair. You're OK with my proposal otherwise? Yes. > Are you looking for Addy or me to submit a patch supporting the "-ns" > suffix on the Designware i2c driver, or should we just use the "-ns" > suffix in the Rockchip driver and assume someone will later add > support for the new binding in the Designware i2c driver? I'd be really happy if you can do it. I'd love to have consistency right away. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: