From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: vinod.koul@intel.com (Vinod Koul) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 18:19:17 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: edma: Split up header file to platform_data and API file In-Reply-To: <1417084891-17990-4-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> References: <1417084891-17990-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <1417084891-17990-4-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Message-ID: <20141208124917.GI16827@intel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:41:31PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > include/linux/platform_data/ is not a correct place to keep the API > definitions for edma, it is meant to be only for the pdata for the device. > Clean up this by moving the API to include/linux/edma.h > > Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi > --- > arch/arm/common/edma.c | 3 +- > arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices.c | 1 + > arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h | 1 + > drivers/dma/edma.c | 2 +- > include/linux/edma.h | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/platform_data/edma.h | 148 ++-------------------------- > sound/soc/davinci/davinci-pcm.h | 1 + > 7 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 include/linux/edma.h I was hoping that this will have delete for platform_data/edma.h, do we still need that and why shouldn't we get rid of this :) -- ~Vinod