From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm: imx: correct the hardware clock gate setting for shared nodes
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:20:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141209092043.GF13486@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141209084653.GR14482@pengutronix.de>
Hallo Sascha,
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 09:46:53AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 03:58:05PM +0800, Anson Huang wrote:
> > For those clk gates which hold share count, since its is_enabled
> > callback is only checking the share count rather than reading
> > the hardware register setting, in the late phase of kernel bootup,
> > the clk_disable_unused action will NOT handle the scenario of
> > share_count is 0 but the hardware setting is enabled, actually,
> > uboot normally enables all clk gates, then those shared clk gates
> > will be always enabled until they are used by some modules.
> >
> > So the problem would be: when kernel boot up, the usecount cat
> > from clk tree is 0, but the clk gates actually is enabled in
> > hardware register, it will confuse user and bring unnecessary power
> > consumption, take i.MX6SX for example, the ESAI clk info
> > is as below, the use count is 0, but the hardware register read
> > from CCM_CCGR1_CG8 is ungated.
>
> I believe the problem is that the shared count is not increased
> correctly during registration. When it would be increased during
> registration for each clock that is enabled in hardware clock_disable_unused
> could do its job like intended.
>
> Could you test the attached patch?
>
> -------------------------------8<--------------------------
>
> From 8095ee6e407f33887b2afa504767d00fcca4f10c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:39:06 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: i.MX: clk-gate2: Fix shared clock enable counting
>
> When during registration of a shared clock the clock is enabled
> in hardware the shared_count must be increased. This makes sure
> that during clk_disable the shared_count is decreased first before
> actually diabling the clock. When done like this the is_enabled
> callback can return the hardware state of the clock, like it is
> intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-gate2.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-gate2.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-gate2.c
> index 5a75cdc..a673364 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-gate2.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-gate2.c
> @@ -96,10 +96,7 @@ static int clk_gate2_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
> {
> struct clk_gate2 *gate = to_clk_gate2(hw);
>
> - if (gate->share_count)
> - return !!__clk_get_enable_count(hw->clk);
> - else
> - return clk_gate2_reg_is_enabled(gate->reg, gate->bit_idx);
> + return clk_gate2_reg_is_enabled(gate->reg, gate->bit_idx);
> }
>
> static struct clk_ops clk_gate2_ops = {
> @@ -129,6 +126,9 @@ struct clk *clk_register_gate2(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> gate->lock = lock;
> gate->share_count = share_count;
>
> + if (share_count && clk_gate2_reg_is_enabled(reg, bit_idx))
> + (*share_count)++;
> +
This is equivalent to calling clk_enable on this clk. So the result is
that clk_disable_unused now succeeds to disable if all related clks are
unused. But it introduces a new problem I think.
Consider that the bootloader starts linux with the clk on, so
assuming 3 shared clks share_count ends at 3 after the clocks are
registered. Then a driver makes use of one of them, calls
clk_prepare_enable on it, share_count becomes 4, enable_count = 1.
clk_disable_unused disables the two unused clks making share_count = 2.
After the driver now calls clk_disable the clk stays on. -> bad
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-09 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-09 7:58 [PATCH] arm: imx: correct the hardware clock gate setting for shared nodes Anson Huang
2014-12-09 8:46 ` Sascha Hauer
2014-12-09 9:20 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2014-12-09 8:57 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-12-10 8:49 ` Anson.Huang at freescale.com
2014-12-10 9:09 ` Uwe Kleine-König
[not found] ` <20141210091126.GA10165@ubuntu>
2014-12-10 10:16 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141209092043.GF13486@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).