From: pavel@ucw.cz (Pavel Machek)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: bluetooth: Add hci_h4p driver
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 23:41:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141214224138.GA11447@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D1F25806-07C6-4876-8E62-A16CFB6827EA@holtmann.org>
Hi!
> >>> Hacks surrounding bluetooth address were removed; this results in
> >>> working driver with address that is probably not unique.
> >>
> >> Just set HCI_QUIRK_INVALID_BDADDR and let someone deal with that in userspace. You can use the btmgmt public-addr command for testing.
> >>
> >
> > Ok, it took me a while to figure out that --enable-experimental is
> > needed.
> >
> > Then help was playing tricks with me:
> >
> > For more information on the usage of each command use:
> > btmgmt <command> --help
> > root at n900:/my/bluez-5.26/tools# ./btmgmt public-addr --help
> > Set Public Address for hci0 failed with status 0x0b (Rejected)
> > root at n900:/my/bluez-5.26/tools# ./btmgmt public-addr
> > Usage: btmgmt public-addr <address>
>
> that is indeed confusing. Something went wrong with that tool. Just keep in mind that tool is just for internal testing by the developers. Someone would still need to write a proper integration with listening for the appropriate events and dig out the actual address from the memory location.
>
You have patch that helps that issues in the email :-).
> > root at n900:/my/bluez-5.26/tools# ./btmgmt public-addr 01:02:03:04:05:06
> > Set Public Address for hci0 failed with status 0x0b (Rejected)
> >
> > Hmm. Since setting public address only works when interface is down,
> > and we lose all the settings during up, this does not work at all,
> > right?
>
> It does keep it. The address is stored in hdev->public_addr which is actually different from hdev->bdaddr which is the current address in use.
>
> However I am not sure that hdev->set_bdaddr is executed again. Same
> as hdev->setup is not executed twice. The controller loosing all
> states is something we have not yet encountered. At least not
> while the hci_dev stays around.
It looks like that's the exact issue. It seems to me like set_bdaddr
is actually called while the device is "down".
> I wonder if the drastic power off might be better hooked into a
> platform RFKILL switch. And with that you would just unregister
> hci_dev and re-register it when the RFKILL switch is unblocked.
Ok, so kernel currently wants bluetooth out of reset at
> The other option is to introduce a quirk that allows running hdev->setup and hdev->set_bdaddr all the time when you bring up your device.
>
> Another alternate idea for getting something upstream for testing is to ignore the whole firmware loading in the kernel and bring up the controller with HCI_QUIRK_EXTERNAL_CONFIG. Doing that would allow you to do bette testing and evolve the driver in small tests.
>
Actually, firmware loading is _not_ the biggest problem. That is
pretty self-contained now.
I guess I should just configure it at probe time, put it into reset
during rmmod, keep it out of reset otherwise, and see how it works.
Thanks,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-14 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-13 22:37 bluetooth: Add hci_h4p driver Pavel Machek
2014-12-13 23:30 ` Marcel Holtmann
2014-12-13 23:51 ` Pavel Machek
2014-12-14 0:07 ` Marcel Holtmann
2014-12-14 9:47 ` Pavel Machek
2014-12-14 10:40 ` Pavel Machek
2014-12-14 11:16 ` Pavel Machek
2014-12-14 19:21 ` Pavel Machek
2014-12-14 20:28 ` Marcel Holtmann
2014-12-14 22:41 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2014-12-14 21:52 ` Pavel Machek
2014-12-15 10:01 ` Oliver Neukum
2014-12-18 19:31 ` Pavel Machek
2014-12-18 20:10 ` Pavel Machek
2014-12-15 12:10 ` Marcel Holtmann
2014-12-19 9:50 ` Pavel Machek
2014-12-19 9:58 ` Marcel Holtmann
2014-12-20 15:48 ` Pavel Machek
2014-12-20 23:39 ` Marcel Holtmann
2014-12-20 20:23 ` [PATCH] " Pavel Machek
2014-12-20 20:43 ` Paul Bolle
2014-12-20 23:35 ` Marcel Holtmann
2014-12-23 12:00 ` Pavel Machek
2014-12-23 12:41 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141214224138.GA11447@amd \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).