From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: regression: Clock changes in next-20141205 break at least omap4
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 20:23:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141216202301.GF11502@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54908F8D.2020202@nvidia.com>
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 01:01:17PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> So the reference clock and functional clock are (usually) required by the
> PLL to operate, and should therefore be required by the PLL clock driver
> code in the kernel; but one could claim that they aren't technically parent
> clocks of the PLL in a clock tree sense, since the downstream output clock
> isn't directly derived from either of those clocks.
The reference clock is the parent clock for a PLL, and the output clock
is a derivative of the reference clock. The PLL maths show that very
clearly.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-16 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-05 16:55 regression: Clock changes in next-20141205 break at least omap4 Tony Lindgren
2014-12-05 18:21 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-12-05 18:38 ` Tony Lindgren
[not found] ` <20141212194238.20398.33333@quantum>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1412122310570.29716@utopia.booyaka.com>
[not found] ` <20141215220224.20398.98259@quantum>
2014-12-16 0:21 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-12-16 0:38 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-12-16 1:31 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-12-16 19:01 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-12-16 20:01 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-12-16 20:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2014-12-16 20:45 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-12-16 20:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-16 22:25 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-12-17 9:52 ` Lucas Stach
2014-12-17 11:59 ` Tero Kristo
2014-12-19 16:45 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-12-18 19:23 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-12-18 23:37 ` Mike Turquette
2014-12-19 2:15 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-12-20 0:23 ` Mike Turquette
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141216202301.GF11502@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).