From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jason@lakedaemon.net (Jason Cooper) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 12:43:00 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 00/27] ARM: mvebu: armada-*: Relicense the device tree under GPLv2+/X11 In-Reply-To: <54945C5C.2080801@free-electrons.com> References: <1418657915-22775-1-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> <54930BBC.4060602@free-electrons.com> <20141218191528.GY967@titan.lakedaemon.net> <549437DD.7040602@free-electrons.com> <20141219160230.GZ967@titan.lakedaemon.net> <54944DAC.1000709@free-electrons.com> <20141219170328.GA967@titan.lakedaemon.net> <54945C5C.2080801@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20141219174300.GB967@titan.lakedaemon.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:11:56PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > On 19/12/2014 18:03, Jason Cooper wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 05:09:16PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > >> On 19/12/2014 17:02, Jason Cooper wrote: > >>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:36:13PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > >>>> On 18/12/2014 20:15, Jason Cooper wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 06:15:40PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > >>>>> ... > >>>>>> Jason at the end it seems you didn't ack or nack the patches were you > >>>>>> were CC. You expressed some concerns about the GPLv2+ move but I don't know > >>>>>> if it is something that prevents you to give your acked-by. > >>>>> > >>>>> Oops. :) I figured my S-o-B when applying would be sufficient. That > >>>>> decision was before we decided on Andrew applying patches this time > >>>>> around... > >>>>> > >>>>> For all my dts{i} contributions: > >>>>> > >>>>> Acked-by: Jason Cooper > >>>> > >>>> Thanks :) > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Due to all the merge commits over time and whatnot, it's probably best > >>>>> to put my Ack on all the patches in this series... > >>>> > >>>> OK no problem. By the way, I take care of collecting all the acked-by and > >>>> once it will be done I will either sent the updated patch set with all the > >>>> acked-by or maybe just I will create a branch to pull if it is easier to handle. > >>> > >>> Ok, that'll be up to Andrew. > >>> > >>> Once we have the last few stragglers, and assuming there are no more > >>> NAKs, here's what I'd like to do: > >>> > >>> Regrettably, we'll have to revert Simon's dts contributions. I say > >> > >> You missed the email he sent yesterday, finally Simon changed his mind > >> and gave his acked-by. > > > > Indeed, that was for the oneliner change in the armada-370-xp.dtsi file. > > I got a bit ahead of myself, but I'm looking towards kirkwood, orion5x, > > dove, which brings up: > > > > 18ba7e4fe51d ARM: Kirkwood: add DT support for d2 Network v2 > > 2d4cd2cafaea ARM: Kirkwood: allow to use netxbig DTSI for d2net_v2 DTS > > a96cc303e42a ARM: mvebu: update the SATA compatible string for Armada 370/XP > > d3dde4df4483 ARM: Kirkwood: update Network Space Mini v2 description > > 98d4f2acb91a ARM: Kirkwood: DT board setup for CloudBox > > 4ea931e07d77 ARM: Kirkwood: fix ns2 gpios by converting to pinctrl > > 7f9871d9d30f ARM: kirkwood: DT board setup for Network Space Mini v2 > > ca7d94524ab3 ARM: kirkwood: DT board setup for Network Space Lite v2 > > ecee1e47ab42 ARM: kirkwood: DT board setup for Network Space v2 and parents > > > > OK I understand your concern now. About dove and kirkwood, did you notice that > some files didn't have any license? Yes. > Especially none of the dove files have a license. Yes, we'll cross that bridge when we get there. I suspect it then falls under the over-arching license of the project. Regardless, we'll still need Acks from all contributors. thx, Jason.