From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com (Alexandre Belloni) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 10:14:12 +0100 Subject: AT91 slow clock mode regression/fixes, improvement proposal In-Reply-To: <20150106142528.GA10330@gradator.net> References: <20141218203904.GA25215@gradator.net> <20141219152625.GA30666@gradator.net> <20150106142528.GA10330@gradator.net> Message-ID: <20150107091412.GA23398@piout.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On 06/01/2015 at 15:25:28 +0100, Sylvain Rochet wrote : > Hello Wenyou, > > On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 03:32:42AM +0000, Yang, Wenyou wrote: > > > > I remembered you said this patch is not formal. Now, would you like > > send a formal one? > > Here it is, the first one is based on linux-at91/linux-3.10-at91 branch, > the second one is rebased on linux-3.18 (Is this the right way when > playing with multiple branch?). You can include that kind of information after the --- marker in the patch so that it is clearer. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com