From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: arm64 fails to build in -next
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 11:20:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150107112019.GI7485@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150107111642.GU2634@sirena.org.uk>
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:16:42AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 05:02:36AM +0000, Build bot for Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > Failed defconfigs:
> > arm64-allnoconfig
> > arm64-allmodconfig
> > arm64-defconfig
>
> For the past few days the arm64 tree hasn't built at all in -next as far
> as I can see:
>
> > arm64-allmodconfig
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/mm/dump.c:55:20: error: 'PCI_IOBASE' undeclared here (not in a function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h:112:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'BUG' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > ../arch/arm64/kernel/module.c:408:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'apply_alternatives' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > ../arch/arm64/kernel/smp_spin_table.c:80:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'ioremap_cache' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > ../arch/arm64/kernel/smp_spin_table.c:92:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'writeq_relaxed' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > ../arch/arm64/kernel/smp_spin_table.c:101:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'iounmap' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
>
> The other builds have a subset of these errors. I spoke to Will on IRC
> yesterday and he mentioned a missing includes fix from Paul Walmsley,
> I've not seen that fix but it sounds like it may well be relevant.
Paul posted a new series of his fixes this morning, so I'll send them in the
pull for -rc4.
Will
parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-07 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <20150107111642.GU2634@sirena.org.uk>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150107112019.GI7485@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).