linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: christoffer.dall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 08/20] arm/arm64: KVM: make the maximum number of vCPUs a per-VM value
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 15:58:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150111145844.GA21444@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1420804478-17354-9-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com>

On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 11:54:26AM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Currently the maximum number of vCPUs supported is a global value
> limited by the used GIC model. GICv3 will lift this limit, but we
> still need to observe it for guests using GICv2.
> So the maximum number of vCPUs is per-VM value, depending on the
> GIC model the guest uses.
> Store and check the value in struct kvm_arch, but keep it down to
> 8 for now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> ---
> Changelog v5...v6:
> - adapt to 3.19-rc changes and to changes due to new 05/20
> 
> Changelog v4...v5:
> - add define for GIC_V2_MAX_CPUS
> - rename max_hw_vcpus
> - add prototype for ARM non-VGIC configs
> 
> Changelog v3...v4:
> - initialize max_vcpus with limit based on host GIC
> - remove *_init_emul_* from VGIC backend
> - refine VCPU limit on VGIC creation
> - print warning when userland tries to create more VCPUs than supported
> 
>  arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h   |    1 +
>  arch/arm/kvm/arm.c                |    8 ++++++++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |    3 +++
>  include/kvm/arm_vgic.h            |    8 ++++++++
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v2.c            |    1 +
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3.c            |    1 +
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c               |   22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  7 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index a4e1155..60c52ad 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ struct kvm_arch {
>  
>  	/* Interrupt controller */
>  	struct vgic_dist	vgic;
> +	int max_vcpus;
>  };
>  
>  #define KVM_NR_MEM_OBJS     40
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> index dd1a689..c33e4ab 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -132,6 +132,9 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
>  	/* Mark the initial VMID generation invalid */
>  	kvm->arch.vmid_gen = 0;
>  
> +	/* The maximum number of VCPUs is limited by the host's GIC model */
> +	kvm->arch.max_vcpus = kvm_vgic_get_max_vcpus();
> +
>  	return ret;
>  out_free_stage2_pgd:
>  	kvm_free_stage2_pgd(kvm);
> @@ -218,6 +221,11 @@ struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id)
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (id >= kvm->arch.max_vcpus) {
> +		err = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
>  	vcpu = kmem_cache_zalloc(kvm_vcpu_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!vcpu) {
>  		err = -ENOMEM;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 37c4ff1..544de35 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ struct kvm_arch {
>  	/* VTTBR value associated with above pgd and vmid */
>  	u64    vttbr;
>  
> +	/* The maximum number of vCPUs depends on the used GIC model */
> +	int max_vcpus;
> +
>  	/* Interrupt controller */
>  	struct vgic_dist	vgic;
>  
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> index dd24396..1c0e9db 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
>  #define VGIC_V2_MAX_LRS		(1 << 6)
>  #define VGIC_V3_MAX_LRS		16
>  #define VGIC_MAX_IRQS		1024
> +#define VGIC_V2_MAX_CPUS	8
>  
>  /* Sanity checks... */
>  #if (KVM_MAX_VCPUS > 8)
> @@ -132,6 +133,7 @@ struct vgic_params {
>  	unsigned int	maint_irq;
>  	/* Virtual control interface base address */
>  	void __iomem	*vctrl_base;
> +	int		max_gic_vcpus;
>  };
>  
>  struct vgic_vm_ops {
> @@ -289,6 +291,7 @@ struct kvm_exit_mmio;
>  int kvm_vgic_addr(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type, u64 *addr, bool write);
>  int kvm_vgic_hyp_init(void);
>  int kvm_vgic_map_resources(struct kvm *kvm);
> +int kvm_vgic_get_max_vcpus(void);
>  int kvm_vgic_create(struct kvm *kvm, u32 type);
>  void kvm_vgic_destroy(struct kvm *kvm);
>  void kvm_vgic_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> @@ -393,6 +396,11 @@ static inline bool vgic_ready(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
>  	return true;
>  }
> +
> +static inline int kvm_vgic_get_max_vcpus(void)
> +{
> +	return KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
> +}
>  #endif
>  
>  #endif
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v2.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v2.c
> index e1cd3cb..e8b82b2 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v2.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v2.c
> @@ -237,6 +237,7 @@ int vgic_v2_probe(struct device_node *vgic_node,
>  		 vctrl_res.start, vgic->maint_irq);
>  
>  	vgic->type = VGIC_V2;
> +	vgic->max_gic_vcpus = VGIC_V2_MAX_CPUS;
>  	*ops = &vgic_v2_ops;
>  	*params = vgic;
>  	goto out;
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3.c
> index d14c75f..ea39bad 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3.c
> @@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ int vgic_v3_probe(struct device_node *vgic_node,
>  	vgic->vcpu_base = vcpu_res.start;
>  	vgic->vctrl_base = NULL;
>  	vgic->type = VGIC_V3;
> +	vgic->max_gic_vcpus = KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
>  
>  	kvm_info("%s@%llx IRQ%d\n", vgic_node->name,
>  		 vcpu_res.start, vgic->maint_irq);
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> index 73cc18e..2bfaf53 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> @@ -1868,6 +1868,17 @@ static int vgic_vcpu_init_maps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int nr_irqs)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * kvm_vgic_get_max_vcpus - Get the maximum number of VCPUs allowed by HW
> + *
> + * The host's GIC naturally limits the maximum amount of VCPUs a guest
> + * can use.
> + */
> +int kvm_vgic_get_max_vcpus(void)
> +{
> +	return vgic->max_gic_vcpus;
> +}
> +
>  void kvm_vgic_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
>  	struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
> @@ -2063,6 +2074,8 @@ static int vgic_v2_init_emulation(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	dist->vm_ops.init_model = vgic_v2_init_model;
>  	dist->vm_ops.map_resources = vgic_v2_map_resources;
>  
> +	kvm->arch.max_vcpus = VGIC_V2_MAX_CPUS;
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -2079,6 +2092,15 @@ static int init_vgic_model(struct kvm *kvm, int type)
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

it looks like these vgic_vX_init_emulation functions don't ever return
an error, so why not make them void functions instead, and just handle
the error with a direct error return in the default case in the switch
statement and get rid of the 'ret' variable completely?

> +
> +	if (atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus) > kvm->arch.max_vcpus) {
> +		pr_warn_ratelimited("VGIC model only supports up to %d vCPUs\n",
> +			kvm->arch.max_vcpus);
> +		ret = -EINVAL;

I think Marc would prefer if we got rid of the pr_warn (or replaced it
with a kvm_debug()).  Not printing anything and returning something else
like ENXIO or E2BIG or something would work for me.

> +	}
> +
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 

Otherwise looks good.

-Christoffer

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-11 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-09 11:54 [PATCH v6 00/20] KVM GICv3 emulation Andre Przywara
2015-01-09 11:54 ` [PATCH v6 01/20] arm/arm64: KVM: rework MPIDR assignment and add accessors Andre Przywara
2015-01-09 11:54 ` [PATCH v6 02/20] arm/arm64: KVM: pass down user space provided GIC type into vGIC code Andre Przywara
2015-01-09 11:54 ` [PATCH v6 03/20] arm/arm64: KVM: refactor vgic_handle_mmio() function Andre Przywara
2015-01-09 11:54 ` [PATCH v6 04/20] arm/arm64: KVM: wrap 64 bit MMIO accesses with two 32 bit ones Andre Przywara
2015-01-09 11:54 ` [PATCH v6 05/20] arm/arm64: KVM: introduce per-VM ops Andre Przywara
2015-01-11 14:58   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-01-09 11:54 ` [PATCH v6 06/20] arm/arm64: KVM: move kvm_register_device_ops() into vGIC probing Andre Przywara
2015-01-09 11:54 ` [PATCH v6 07/20] arm/arm64: KVM: dont rely on a valid GICH base address Andre Przywara
2015-01-09 11:54 ` [PATCH v6 08/20] arm/arm64: KVM: make the maximum number of vCPUs a per-VM value Andre Przywara
2015-01-11 14:58   ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2015-01-12  9:34     ` Andre Przywara
2015-01-09 11:54 ` [PATCH v6 09/20] arm/arm64: KVM: make the value of ICC_SRE_EL1 a per-VM variable Andre Przywara
2015-01-09 11:54 ` [PATCH v6 10/20] arm/arm64: KVM: refactor MMIO accessors Andre Przywara
2015-01-09 11:54 ` [PATCH v6 11/20] arm/arm64: KVM: refactor/wrap vgic_set/get_attr() Andre Przywara
2015-01-09 11:54 ` [PATCH v6 12/20] arm/arm64: KVM: add vgic.h header file Andre Przywara
2015-01-09 11:54 ` [PATCH v6 13/20] arm/arm64: KVM: split GICv2 specific emulation code from vgic.c Andre Przywara
2015-01-09 11:54 ` [PATCH v6 14/20] arm/arm64: KVM: add opaque private pointer to MMIO data Andre Przywara
2015-01-09 11:54 ` [PATCH v6 15/20] arm/arm64: KVM: add virtual GICv3 distributor emulation Andre Przywara
2015-01-11 15:15   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-01-12  9:57     ` Andre Przywara
2015-01-12 17:08       ` Christoffer Dall
2015-01-09 11:54 ` [PATCH v6 16/20] arm64: GICv3: introduce symbolic names for GICv3 ICC_SGI1R_EL1 fields Andre Przywara
2015-01-09 11:54 ` [PATCH v6 17/20] arm64: KVM: add SGI generation register emulation Andre Przywara
2015-01-09 11:54 ` [PATCH v6 18/20] KVM: introduce kvm_check_device_type() Andre Przywara
2015-01-09 12:33   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-01-09 13:42     ` Andre Przywara
2015-01-11 15:22       ` Christoffer Dall
2015-01-12 12:33         ` Andre Przywara
2015-01-12 17:11           ` Christoffer Dall
2015-01-14 12:33           ` Andre Przywara
2015-01-09 11:54 ` [PATCH v6 19/20] arm/arm64: KVM: enable kernel side of GICv3 emulation Andre Przywara
2015-01-11 15:32   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-01-09 11:54 ` [PATCH v6 20/20] arm/arm64: KVM: allow userland to request a virtual GICv3 Andre Przywara
2015-01-11 15:35   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-01-13 16:25 ` [PATCH v6 00/20] KVM GICv3 emulation Tomasz Nowicki
2015-01-14  0:04   ` Andre Przywara
2015-01-14  8:50     ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-01-14  8:51       ` Eric Auger
2015-01-14 10:48         ` Andre Przywara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150111145844.GA21444@cbox \
    --to=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).