linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: matt@codeblueprint.co.uk (Matt Fleming)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 6/8] arm64/efi: move SetVirtualAddressMap() to UEFI stub
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:43:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150112104339.GB26589@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150106180120.GF3827@bivouac.eciton.net>

On Tue, 06 Jan, at 06:01:20PM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 04:54:02PM +0000, Matt Fleming wrote:
> 
> I think all we really need above what efi_get_memory_map() provides is
> the scratch space. Would we care about temporarily wasting a little
> bit of EFI_LOADER_DATA on all platforms, or could we just swap the
> function body in efi-stub-helper.c for Ard's version above?
> 
> (I would guess memory maps with <= 32 entries are uncommon anyway, so
> the existing version would already make the bootservice call twice.)
 
I've no concerns about using the additional scratch space.

[...]

> Mmm, not optimal.
> That said, the only arm*-specific things about this particular
> function are the page sizes. Should this move to efi-stub-helper.c
> with EFI_RT_VIRTUAL_BASE moved to arch/<x>/include/asm/efi.h and
> joined by EFI_RT_VIRTUAL_BASE_ALIGN and EFI_RT_VIRTUAL_REGION_ALIGN?

Yeah, that would be an improvement. It's possible we could reuse some of
this code for x86's EFI virtual mapping code that Borislav wrote
(maybe).

-- 
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-12 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-22 10:58 [PATCH v4 0/8] stable UEFI virtual mappings for kexec Ard Biesheuvel
2014-12-22 10:58 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] arm64/mm: add explicit struct_mm argument to __create_mapping() Ard Biesheuvel
2014-12-22 10:58 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] arm64/mm: add create_pgd_mapping() to create private page tables Ard Biesheuvel
2014-12-22 10:58 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] efi: split off remapping code from efi_config_init() Ard Biesheuvel
2015-01-05 14:55   ` Matt Fleming
2015-01-05 21:56   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-12-22 10:59 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] efi: efistub: allow allocation alignment larger than EFI_PAGE_SIZE Ard Biesheuvel
2014-12-23 16:45   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-12-29  9:25     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-12-29  9:47       ` Borislav Petkov
2015-01-05 11:24         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-12-22 10:59 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] arm64/efi: set EFI_ALLOC_ALIGN to 64 KB Ard Biesheuvel
2015-01-06 16:37   ` Leif Lindholm
2014-12-22 10:59 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] arm64/efi: move SetVirtualAddressMap() to UEFI stub Ard Biesheuvel
2015-01-05 16:20   ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-06 17:13     ` Leif Lindholm
2015-01-07 18:05     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-01-05 16:54   ` Matt Fleming
2015-01-06 18:01     ` Leif Lindholm
2015-01-12 10:43       ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2015-01-07 18:15     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-01-07 12:06   ` Leif Lindholm
2015-01-07 12:16     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-01-07 12:25       ` Leif Lindholm
2015-01-07 12:30         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-01-07 12:56           ` Leif Lindholm
2014-12-22 10:59 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] arm64/efi: remove free_boot_services() and friends Ard Biesheuvel
2015-01-06 18:06   ` Leif Lindholm
2014-12-22 10:59 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] arm64/efi: remove idmap manipulations from UEFI code Ard Biesheuvel
2015-01-06 18:17   ` Leif Lindholm

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150112104339.GB26589@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --to=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).