linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: christoffer.dall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] arm64: remove ESR_EL1_* macros
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:20:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150112172043.GB24754@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150112112737.GC16706@leverpostej>

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:27:37AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 06:08:05PM +0000, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 12:04:16PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > Now that all users have been moved over to the common ESR_ELx_* macros,
> > > remove the redundant ESR_EL1 macros.
> > > 
> > > There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > > Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> > > Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> > > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> > 
> > FYI: This breaks bisectability with KVM, so we should probably move the
> > existing KVM references to the common definitions as part of this patch?
> 
> Sorry about that, evidently I forgot the KVM code referred to some
> ESR_EL1_* definitions when I reorganised the series.
> 
> Are you happy if I just move this patch after the KVM changes? That
> should keep everything bisectable and leaves the KVM changes confined to
> a single patch.
> 
sounds fine.

-Christoffer

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-12 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-07 12:04 [PATCH 0/7] arm64/kvm: common ESR_ELx definitions and decoding Mark Rutland
2015-01-07 12:04 ` [PATCH 1/7] arm64: introduce common ESR_ELx_* definitions Mark Rutland
2015-01-07 16:23   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-01-07 16:42     ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-07 16:57       ` Catalin Marinas
2015-01-07 18:49         ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-11 16:59   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-01-12 11:20     ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-07 12:04 ` [PATCH 2/7] arm64: move to ESR_ELx macros Mark Rutland
2015-01-11 17:01   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-01-07 12:04 ` [PATCH 3/7] arm64: remove ESR_EL1_* macros Mark Rutland
2015-01-11 18:08   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-01-12 11:27     ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-12 17:20       ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2015-01-07 12:04 ` [PATCH 4/7] arm64: decode ESR_ELx.EC when reporting exceptions Mark Rutland
2015-01-11 18:22   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-01-07 12:04 ` [PATCH 5/7] arm64: kvm: move to ESR_ELx macros Mark Rutland
2015-01-11 18:27   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-01-12 11:40     ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-07 12:04 ` [PATCH 6/7] arm64: kvm: remove ESR_EL2_* macros Mark Rutland
2015-01-11 18:27   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-01-07 12:04 ` [PATCH 7/7] arm64: kvm: decode ESR_ELx.EC when reporting exceptions Mark Rutland
2015-01-11 18:29   ` Christoffer Dall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150112172043.GB24754@cbox \
    --to=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).