From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: balbi@ti.com (Felipe Balbi) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:31:26 -0600 Subject: [PATCH v3 3/5] ARM: at91/dt: update udc compatible strings In-Reply-To: <20150112201816.6e57fe74@bbrezillon> References: <1421060278-27329-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <1421060278-27329-4-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <20150112182349.GJ6525@saruman> <20150112201816.6e57fe74@bbrezillon> Message-ID: <20150112193126.GC2858@saruman> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 08:18:16PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Hi Felipe, > > On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:23:49 -0600 > Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:57:56AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > at91sam9g45, at91sam9x5 and sama5 SoCs should not use > > > "atmel,at91sam9rl-udc" for their USB device compatible property since > > > this compatible is attached to a specific hardware bug fix. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon > > > Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni > > > > WARNING: DT compatible string "atmel,at91sam9g45-udc" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ > > #177: FILE: drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1827: > > + { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-udc" }, > > > > WARNING: DT compatible string "atmel,sama5d3-udc" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ > > #178: FILE: drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1828: > > + { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-udc" }, > > > > please fix and resend. Also, when resending, could you add Nicolas' > > Acked-by since he's already given it ? > > Actually these compatible strings are documented in the first patch > (where they were introduced), but I'll send a v4 with Nicolas' ack. heh, checkpatch stupidity :-) My bad. -- balbi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: