linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] clk: at91: keep slow clk enabled to prevent system hang
@ 2015-01-13 14:44 Boris Brezillon
  2015-01-13 19:06 ` Mike Turquette
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2015-01-13 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

All slow clk users are not properly claiming it (get + prepare + enable)
before using it.
If all users properly claiming this clock release it, the clock is
disabled, but faulty users still depends on it, and the system hangs.

This fix prevents the slow clock from being disabled, and should solve the
hanging issue, but offending drivers should be patched to properly claim
this clock.

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Reported-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/clk/at91/clk-slow.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-slow.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-slow.c
index 32f7c1b..2f13bd5 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-slow.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-slow.c
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ struct clk_sam9x5_slow {
 
 #define to_clk_sam9x5_slow(hw) container_of(hw, struct clk_sam9x5_slow, hw)
 
+static struct clk *slow_clk;
 
 static int clk_slow_osc_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
 {
@@ -357,6 +358,8 @@ at91_clk_register_sam9x5_slow(void __iomem *sckcr,
 	clk = clk_register(NULL, &slowck->hw);
 	if (IS_ERR(clk))
 		kfree(slowck);
+	else
+		slow_clk = clk;
 
 	return clk;
 }
@@ -433,6 +436,8 @@ at91_clk_register_sam9260_slow(struct at91_pmc *pmc,
 	clk = clk_register(NULL, &slowck->hw);
 	if (IS_ERR(clk))
 		kfree(slowck);
+	else
+		slow_clk = clk;
 
 	return clk;
 }
@@ -465,3 +470,25 @@ void __init of_at91sam9260_clk_slow_setup(struct device_node *np,
 
 	of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_simple_get, clk);
 }
+
+/*
+ * FIXME: All slow clk users are not properly claiming it (get + prepare +
+ * enable) before using it.
+ * If all users properly claiming this clock decide that they don't need it
+ * anymore (or are removed), it is disabled while faulty users are still
+ * requiring it, and the system hangs.
+ * Prevent this clock from being disabled until all users are properly
+ * requesting it.
+ * Once this is done we should remove this function and the slow_clk variable.
+ */
+static int __init of_at91_clk_slow_retain(void)
+{
+	if (!slow_clk)
+		return 0;
+
+	__clk_get(slow_clk);
+	clk_prepare_enable(slow_clk);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+arch_initcall(of_at91_clk_slow_retain);
-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2] clk: at91: keep slow clk enabled to prevent system hang
  2015-01-13 14:44 [PATCH v2] clk: at91: keep slow clk enabled to prevent system hang Boris Brezillon
@ 2015-01-13 19:06 ` Mike Turquette
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mike Turquette @ 2015-01-13 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Quoting Boris Brezillon (2015-01-13 06:44:06)
> All slow clk users are not properly claiming it (get + prepare + enable)
> before using it.
> If all users properly claiming this clock release it, the clock is
> disabled, but faulty users still depends on it, and the system hangs.
> 
> This fix prevents the slow clock from being disabled, and should solve the
> hanging issue, but offending drivers should be patched to properly claim
> this clock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> Reported-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org

Applied to clk-fixes towards the next -rc.

Thanks,
Mike

> ---
>  drivers/clk/at91/clk-slow.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-slow.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-slow.c
> index 32f7c1b..2f13bd5 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-slow.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-slow.c
> @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ struct clk_sam9x5_slow {
>  
>  #define to_clk_sam9x5_slow(hw) container_of(hw, struct clk_sam9x5_slow, hw)
>  
> +static struct clk *slow_clk;
>  
>  static int clk_slow_osc_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
>  {
> @@ -357,6 +358,8 @@ at91_clk_register_sam9x5_slow(void __iomem *sckcr,
>         clk = clk_register(NULL, &slowck->hw);
>         if (IS_ERR(clk))
>                 kfree(slowck);
> +       else
> +               slow_clk = clk;
>  
>         return clk;
>  }
> @@ -433,6 +436,8 @@ at91_clk_register_sam9260_slow(struct at91_pmc *pmc,
>         clk = clk_register(NULL, &slowck->hw);
>         if (IS_ERR(clk))
>                 kfree(slowck);
> +       else
> +               slow_clk = clk;
>  
>         return clk;
>  }
> @@ -465,3 +470,25 @@ void __init of_at91sam9260_clk_slow_setup(struct device_node *np,
>  
>         of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_simple_get, clk);
>  }
> +
> +/*
> + * FIXME: All slow clk users are not properly claiming it (get + prepare +
> + * enable) before using it.
> + * If all users properly claiming this clock decide that they don't need it
> + * anymore (or are removed), it is disabled while faulty users are still
> + * requiring it, and the system hangs.
> + * Prevent this clock from being disabled until all users are properly
> + * requesting it.
> + * Once this is done we should remove this function and the slow_clk variable.
> + */
> +static int __init of_at91_clk_slow_retain(void)
> +{
> +       if (!slow_clk)
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       __clk_get(slow_clk);
> +       clk_prepare_enable(slow_clk);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +arch_initcall(of_at91_clk_slow_retain);
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-13 19:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-01-13 14:44 [PATCH v2] clk: at91: keep slow clk enabled to prevent system hang Boris Brezillon
2015-01-13 19:06 ` Mike Turquette

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).