From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Regression with legacy IRQ numbers caused by 9a1091ef0017
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:14:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150114221407.GS2419@atomide.com> (raw)
Hi all,
Looks like the legacy IRQ numbers are now all wrong at least for omap4
since commit 9a1091ef0017 ("irqchip: gic: Support hierarchy irq domain.").
Instead of this:
# cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1
29: 1124 981 GIC 29 twd
39: 0 0 GIC 39 TWL6030-PIH
41: 0 0 GIC 41 l3-dbg-irq
42: 0 0 GIC 42 l3-app-irq
44: 0 0 GIC 44 DMA
45: 7854 0 GIC 45 omap-dma-engine
52: 0 0 GIC 52 gpmc
...
We now have:
# cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1
16: 343 0 GIC 69 gp_timer
17: 1160 1017 GIC 29 twd
18: 0 0 GIC 41 l3-dbg-irq
19: 1 0 GIC 42 l3-app-irq
22: 7850 0 GIC 45 omap-dma-engine
44: 0 0 4a310000.gpio 18 DMA
61: 2730 0 48055000.gpio 2 eth0
223: 0 0 GIC 52 gpmc
...
So the DMA interrupt using the legacy mapping with something like
irq = 12 + OMAP44XX_IRQ_GIC_START now is wrong and unfortunately
at least omaps still have a bunch of the legacy interrupts still
around.
And that naturally produces all kinds of strange errors like:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at drivers/bus/omap_l3_noc.c:147 l3_interrupt_handler+0x214/0x340()
44000000.ocp:L3 Custom Error: MASTER MPU TARGET L4CFG (Idle): Data Access in Supervisor mode during Functional access
...
[<c05f21e4>] (__irq_svc) from [<c05f1974>] (_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x34/0x44)
[<c05f1974>] (_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore) from [<c00914a8>] (__setup_irq+0x244/0x530)
[<c00914a8>] (__setup_irq) from [<c00917d4>] (setup_irq+0x40/0x8c)
[<c00917d4>] (setup_irq) from [<c0039c8c>] (omap_system_dma_probe+0x1d4/0x2b4)
[<c0039c8c>] (omap_system_dma_probe) from [<c03b2200>] (platform_drv_probe+0x44/0xa4)
...
Looks like the logic changed from:
if (of_property_read_u32(node, "arm,routable-irqs", &nr_routable_irqs))
to just
if (node)
Which now causes irq_domain_add_linear() to be called instead of
irq_domain_add_legacy(), which causes the breakage.
Anybody got a sane fix in mind for the -rc series, or should we just
revert it for now?
Regards,
Tony
next reply other threads:[~2015-01-14 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-14 22:14 Tony Lindgren [this message]
2015-01-15 10:50 ` Regression with legacy IRQ numbers caused by 9a1091ef0017 Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-15 15:28 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-15 17:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-16 16:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-16 16:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-16 16:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-16 16:46 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-01-16 17:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-16 17:29 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-16 22:52 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-16 22:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-16 22:57 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-15 13:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-01-15 14:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-15 14:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-01-15 15:37 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-16 16:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-16 17:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-01-17 0:48 ` Simon Horman
2015-01-15 16:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150114221407.GS2419@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).