From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com (Alexandre Belloni)
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 17:59:14 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] clockevents: don't suspend/resume if unused
In-Reply-To: <20150116092014.GA27945@gradator.net>
References: <1421399151-26800-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
 <20150116092014.GA27945@gradator.net>
Message-ID: <20150116165914.GS3843@piout.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi,

On 16/01/2015 at 10:20:14 +0100, Sylvain Rochet wrote :
> > +		if (dev->suspend && dev->mode != CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED)
> 
> I wonder if we should use > CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN
> (or CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED || CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN) instead of 
> !CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED.
> 

I'll let Thomas or Daniel decide :) But I'm open to that.

>-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com