From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (Boris Brezillon) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:45:16 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] clocksource: don't suspend/resume when unused In-Reply-To: <1421427439-11699-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> References: <1421427439-11699-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20150116184516.735cd2de@bbrezillon> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 17:57:17 +0100 Alexandre Belloni wrote: > This is a quite naive implementation to track whether a clocksource is enabled. > I chose not to add a member in struct clocksource and use a flag instead. > > I found that timekeeping.c is the only consumer for clocksource and I converted > it to use clocksource_enable and clocksource_disable. To the whole series: Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon > > Changes in v2: > - removed the check on enable in timekeeping.c to ensure all clocksources are > going through clocksource_enable > - rework clocksource_enable to set CLOCK_SOURCE_USED when enable is successful > if present > > Alexandre Belloni (2): > clocksource: track usage > clocksource: don't suspend/resume when unused > > include/linux/clocksource.h | 4 ++++ > kernel/time/clocksource.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 8 +++----- > 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > -- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com