linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: mfd: add lubbock-io binding
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:35:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150119083533.GF21886@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421406010-14851-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr>

On Fri, 16 Jan 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:

> Add a binding for lubbock motherboard IO board.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/lubbock-io.txt         | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/lubbock-io.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/lubbock-io.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/lubbock-io.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..33c9e21
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/lubbock-io.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +Intel's pxa255 system development platform motherboard.

s/pxa25/PXA25/

"system development platform motherboard" doesn't quite sit right with me.

How about "Intel Xscale PXA255 development platform (Lubbock)"?

> +This is the motherboard, or IO board, of the pxa25x development system,
> +supporting a lubbock pxa25x SoC board.

Again, this sounds weird.

> +Required properties:
> +  - compatible : One of the following chip-specific strings:
> +        "intel,lubbock-io"

An odd thing to say with only one entry.

Also, please line it up to the right of the ':' above.

> +  - interrupts : The first interrupt is the line the /IRQ signal the IO board
> +                 multiplex is connected to. The only known case is GPIO0 on the
> +                 pxa25x SoC.

Can you get someone to help you re-word this into a more fluid
sentence?

> +Optional properties:
> +  - interrupts : The second optional interrupt is the base of the interrupts
> +                 multiplexed by the lubbock motherboard. If unspecified, the
> +                 range is fully dynamic, and the irqdomain will generate its
> +                 interrupt base on the fly.
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +mb: lubbock-mb at 0 {
> +	compatible = "intel,lubbock-io";
> +	interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING 400 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
> +	#interrupt-cells = <2>;
> +        interrupt-parent = <&pxairq>;

Whitespace error.

> +};

I'm guessing mb means motherboard?  I think it's unusual for a
motherboard to have it's own driver.  Usually we provide drivers for
the individual components/peripherals situated on the board.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-01-19  8:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-16 11:00 [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: mfd: add lubbock-io binding Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-16 11:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mfd: lubbock_io: add lubbock_io board Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-19  9:17   ` Lee Jones
2015-01-19 19:09     ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-20 10:29       ` Lee Jones
2015-01-20 11:56         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-21  7:46           ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-21  8:16             ` Lee Jones
2015-01-21  8:27               ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-21 12:35                 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-21 13:02                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-21 13:36                   ` robert.jarzmik at free.fr
2015-01-21 15:10                     ` Lee Jones
2015-01-21 19:22                       ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-21  9:47               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-21  9:44             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-21 16:05               ` unclear ipv6 redirect message (was Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mfd: lubbock_io: add lubbock_io board) Joe Perches
2015-01-21 16:11                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-21 16:40                   ` Joe Perches
2015-01-21 16:46                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-16 11:00 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] ARM: pxa: lubbock: use new lubbock_io driver Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-19  8:35 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2015-01-19 19:29   ` [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: mfd: add lubbock-io binding Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-20 10:18     ` Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150119083533.GF21886@x1 \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).