From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:37:39 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v7 06/17] ARM64 / ACPI: Make PCI optional for ACPI on ARM64 In-Reply-To: <20150118092955.GE6182@xora-haswell.xora.org.uk> References: <1421247905-3749-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1421247905-3749-7-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <20150116094913.GA13634@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <54BB51F1.8000900@linaro.org> <508480149.12941388.1421562696311.JavaMail.zimbra@zmail15.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <54BB56CB.7040701@linaro.org> <20150118092955.GE6182@xora-haswell.xora.org.uk> Message-ID: <20150119103737.GD11835@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 09:29:56AM +0000, Graeme Gregory wrote: > On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 02:46:35PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: > > On 2015?01?18? 14:31, Jon Masters wrote: > > >Hi Folks, > > > > > >Sorry for top posting from bed. The mainstream servers will all likely do > > > PCIe but there are several that may not. They should not be excluded. That > > said, > > >if we booted a previously built kernel on a system without an MCFG and > > > got no ECAM/root then things would probably still work. > > > > > >I think it'll work out either way but for the record there is no requirement to do PCIe on ARM servers that conform to spec. > > > > OK, Catalin already said that was not the main point of the > > comments for this patch, I think the title and change log > > of the patch is inconsistent with the code makes Catalin confused, > > I will update them in next version. > > Well what we are talking about is the presence of CONFIG_PCI=y which even > in Jons case will be true as he wants to run the same kernel on both > sets of hardware. > > Now the architecture has PCI support I think its safe to remove the make > PCI optional part of the patch as this should be handled runtime not > compile time. I agree, if we never see a reason to build a kernel image with !PCI && ACPI, we can simplify this patch. -- Catalin