From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:40:54 +0000
Subject: [PATCHv7 2/2] arm64: add better page protections to arm64
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jLSQHC=R7gr+ZbgQ81K=v+zXS+uxyNofg9xGsovO8qssg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1421276394-20402-1-git-send-email-lauraa@codeaurora.org>
 <1421276394-20402-3-git-send-email-lauraa@codeaurora.org>
 <CAKv+Gu8iGAPpR49EQKwmOZp2cHGdg8QJyoh2x1BB9uW6-S5L4g@mail.gmail.com>
 <54B9AC53.8020903@codeaurora.org>
 <20150120181453.GI25575@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
 <CAGXu5jLSQHC=R7gr+ZbgQ81K=v+zXS+uxyNofg9xGsovO8qssg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20150120184054.GJ25575@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 06:19:23PM +0000, Kees Cook wrote:
> If, however, only the name is stopping it from landing in arm64, then
> I don't care what it's called. ;)

Apart from couple of comments on this latest series, the patches look
fine to me.

One question for Laura though: have the patches been tested it with:

- 4-levels and 4KB pages?
- 3-levels and 64KB pages?

-- 
Catalin