[PATCHv2 0/5] arm: specify PMU type in platform data

[mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)]

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:17:18AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 04:07:24PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Currently the ARMv6, ARMv7, and XScale PMU drivers are coupled with each
> > other, and all included in the same c file. To enable the splitting of
> > the ARMv6, ARMv7, and XScale PMU drivers, and the conversion of the
> > arm_pmu framework to a pure library, we need to be a be more precise
> > when describing PMUs, to enable association of the PMU with the right
> > driver. In device tree this is already implicit in the compatible
> > string, but platform data currently only specifies "arm-pmu".
> > 
> > Commit 253d8c3d2518ca6f (arm: perf: add more specific platform device
> > IDs) added "armv6-pmu", "armv7-pmu", and "xscale-pmu" platform device
> > IDs, enabling the three to be distinguished. This series updates
> > platform code to use these strings.
> > 
> > A later patch series will decouple the drivers.
> > 
> > Since v1 [1]:
> > * Rebase to v3.19-rc4.
> > * Add Acks.
> > * Drop vexpress patches (platform code deleted).
> > 
> > Simon, in v1 you mentioned you were happy to take the shmobile patch
> > through your tree. Are you still happy to do so, or to give your ack
> > such that these can go through arm-soc together?
> > 
> > While I'm not too concerned which route these patches take, it would be
> > nice to have a single base for the patches splitting the drivers.
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> assuming that this is targeted at v3.20 then it looks like your
> changes do not conflict with anything I have queued up and
> I am not likely to queue anything more up for the files in question
> for that release. As my main concern is about conflicts I'm therefore
> quite happy for you to take the shmobile patch through your tree.
> I'll supply an ack accordingly.

Thanks, Simon, it's much appreciated.

Arnd, Olof, are you happy to pick this up for v3.20? I believe all the
patches have now been appropriately acked.

If it makes things any easier I've placed the series (with new acks) on
my arm/perf/platform-updates branch [2], based atop of v3.19-rc4.

Thanks,
Mark.

[2] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git arm/perf/platform-updates

> 
> > Thanks,
> > Mark.
> > 
> > [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-November/304078.html
> > 
> > Mark Rutland (5):
> >   arm: realview: specify PMU types
> >   arm: pxa: specify PMUs are for XScale CPUs
> >   arm: iop: specify PMUs are for XScale CPUs
> >   arm: shmobile: specify PMUs are for ARMv7 CPUs
> >   arm: omap: specify PMUs are for ARMv7 CPUs
> > 
> >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/pmu.c                | 5 +++--
> >  arch/arm/mach-pxa/devices.c              | 2 +-
> >  arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_eb.c     | 3 ++-
> >  arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c | 2 +-
> >  arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb11mp.c | 2 +-
> >  arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pba8.c   | 2 +-
> >  arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pbx.c    | 2 +-
> >  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7740.c   | 2 +-
> >  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c    | 2 +-
> >  arch/arm/plat-iop/pmu.c                  | 2 +-
> >  10 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > 
> > -- 
> > 1.9.1
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> > 
>