From: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com (Alexandre Belloni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: at91: fix PM initialization for newer SoCs
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:11:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150123101123.GF19922@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D0221EB9-B6B3-4860-83D6-427E3C718193@jcrosoft.com>
On 23/01/2015 at 15:50:13 +0800, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote :
>
> > On Jan 23, 2015, at 12:07 AM, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Newer SoCs: at91sam9x5, at91sam9n12, sama5d3 and sama5d4 embed a DDR controller
> > and have a different PMC status register layout than the at91sam9g45. Create
> > another at91_sam9x5_pm_init() function to match this compatibility.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sam9.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sama5.c | 2 +-
> > arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h | 2 ++
> > arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c | 7 +++++++
> > 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sam9.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sam9.c
> > index 0fe1ced608c5..c8252ddac6f0 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sam9.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sam9.c
> > @@ -61,3 +61,23 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(at91sam9g45_dt, "Atmel AT91SAM9G45")
> > .init_machine = sam9g45_dt_device_init,
> > .dt_compat = at91_9g45_board_compat,
> > MACHINE_END
> > +
> > +static void __init sam9x5_dt_device_init(void)
> > +{
> > + at91_sam9x5_pm_init();
> > + of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const char *at91_9x5_board_compat[] __initconst = {
> > + "atmel,at91sam9x5",
> > + "atmel,at91sam9n12",
> > + NULL
> > +};
> > +
> > +DT_MACHINE_START(at91sam9x5_dt, "Atmel AT91SAM9?)
> sam9? sam9x5
> > + /* Maintainer: Atmel */
> > + .map_io = at91_map_io,
> > + .init_early = at91_dt_initialize,
> > + .init_machine = sam9x5_dt_device_init,
> > + .dt_compat = at91_9x5_board_compat,
> > +MACHINE_END
>
> why a second START instead of a pdata?
>
> and create a second dt compatible
> e
The real solution to that is to match the pmc compatible in pm.c
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-23 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-15 14:59 [PATCH v2 0/8] AT91 cleanup for 3.20 #2 Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] ARM: at91: pm: rework cpu detection Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 2:44 ` Yang, Wenyou
2015-01-16 10:26 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] ARM: at91: pm: use the mmio-sram pool to access SRAM Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] ARM: at91: pm: add UDP and UHP checks to newer SoCs Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] ARM: at91: pm: prepare for multiplatform Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-22 16:03 ` [PATCH] ARM: at91: fix PM initialization for newer SoCs Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-22 16:07 ` [PATCH v2] " Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-23 7:50 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-01-23 10:11 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2015-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] ARM: at91: remove useless map_io Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] ARM: at91: sama5d4: remove useless call to at91_init_sram Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] ARM: at91: remove unused at91_init_sram Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] ARM: at91: move at91rm9200_idle() to clk/at91/pmc.c Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] AT91 cleanup for 3.20 #2 Nicolas Ferre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150123101123.GF19922@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).