From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com (Alexandre Belloni)
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 00:13:15 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 07/12] pm: at91: the standby mode uses the same sram
 function as the suspend to memory mode
In-Reply-To: <20150123165020.GA24210@gradator.net>
References: <1421741825-18226-1-git-send-email-wenyou.yang@atmel.com>
 <1421741825-18226-8-git-send-email-wenyou.yang@atmel.com>
 <20150123165020.GA24210@gradator.net>
Message-ID: <20150123231315.GA32318@piout.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 23/01/2015 at 17:50:20 +0100, Sylvain Rochet wrote :
> Hello Wenyou,
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 04:17:00PM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote:
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> > index 691e6db..a1010f0 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> 
> 
> > @@ -145,62 +145,51 @@ extern void at91_slow_clock(void __iomem *pmc, void __iomem *ramc0,
> >  			    void __iomem *ramc1, int memctrl);
> >  extern u32 at91_slow_clock_sz;
> >  
> > +static void at91_pm_suspend(suspend_state_t state)
> > +{
>       (...)
> > +	slow_clock(at91_pmc_base, at91_ramc_base[0],
> > +			at91_ramc_base[1], pm_data);
> > +}
> 
> 
> > -			if (slow_clock) {
> > -				slow_clock(at91_pmc_base, at91_ramc_base[0],
> > -					   at91_ramc_base[1],
> > -					   at91_pm_data.memctrl);
>       (...)
> > +               at91_pm_suspend(state);
> 
> 
> By doing that you removed the condition "if (slow_clock)".
> 
> But slow_clock can still be NULL, see commit d2e4679, there are multiple 
> reasons which ends up with a NULL slow_clock.
> 

I would fix that by not calling suspend_set_ops(&at91_pm_ops) when
slow_clock is NULL in patch 6 (quick and easy) or copying the whole
at91_pm_sram_init() in at91_pm_init() and handle failures from there.


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com