linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: joro@8bytes.org (Joerg Roedel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 11/18] iommu: exynos: remove useless device_add/remove callbacks
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:00:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150126110059.GC30345@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2829552.kzfCU5HyxQ@avalon>

Hi Laurent,

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 05:38:22PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> IOMMU groups still seem a bit unclear to me. Will Deacon has nicely explained 
> what they represent in
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-December/310816.html.
> The IOMMU core doesn't make groups 
> mandatory, but requires them in some code paths.
> 
> For example the coldplug device add function add_iommu_group() called for all 
> devices already registered when bus_set_iommu() is called will try to warn of 
> devices added multiple times with a WARN_ON(dev->iommu_group). Another example 
> is the iommu_bus_notifier() function which will call the remove_device() 
> operation only when dev->iommu_group isn't NULL.
> 
> I'm thus unsure whether groups should be made mandatory, or whether the IOMMU 
> core should be fixed to make them really optional (or, third option, whether 
> there's something I haven't understood properly).

My plan is to make IOMMU groups mandatory. I am currently preparing and
RFC patch-set to introduce default-domains (which will be per group). So
when all IOMMU drivers are converted to make use of default domains the
iommu groups will be mandatory.


	Joerg

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-26 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-23 15:51 [PATCH v5 00/18] Exynos SYSMMU (IOMMU) integration with DT and DMA-mapping subsystem Marek Szyprowski
2015-01-23 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 01/18] drm: exynos: detach from default dma-mapping domain on init Marek Szyprowski
2015-01-23 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 02/18] arm: exynos: pm_domains: add support for devices registered before arch_initcall Marek Szyprowski
2015-01-23 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 03/18] ARM: dts: exynos4: add sysmmu nodes Marek Szyprowski
2015-01-23 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 04/18] ARM: dts: exynos5250: " Marek Szyprowski
2015-01-27  6:25   ` Hongbo Zhang
2015-02-22 17:58   ` Andreas Färber
2015-01-23 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 05/18] ARM: dts: exynos5420: " Marek Szyprowski
2015-02-22 18:00   ` Andreas Färber
2015-01-23 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 06/18] iommu: exynos: don't read version register on every tlb operation Marek Szyprowski
2015-01-23 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 07/18] iommu: exynos: remove unused functions Marek Szyprowski
2015-01-23 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 08/18] iommu: exynos: remove useless spinlock Marek Szyprowski
2015-01-23 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 09/18] iommu: exynos: refactor function parameters to simplify code Marek Szyprowski
2015-01-23 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 10/18] iommu: exynos: remove unused functions, part 2 Marek Szyprowski
2015-01-23 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 11/18] iommu: exynos: remove useless device_add/remove callbacks Marek Szyprowski
2015-01-25 15:38   ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-01-26 11:00     ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2015-01-26 11:09       ` Will Deacon
2015-01-26 12:06       ` Marek Szyprowski
2015-01-26 13:03       ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-01-26 13:47         ` Joerg Roedel
2015-01-23 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 12/18] iommu: exynos: add support for binding more than one sysmmu to master device Marek Szyprowski
2015-01-23 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 13/18] iommu: exynos: add support for runtime_pm Marek Szyprowski
2015-01-23 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 14/18] iommu: exynos: rename variables to reflect their purpose Marek Szyprowski
2015-01-23 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 15/18] iommu: exynos: document internal structures Marek Szyprowski
2015-01-23 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 16/18] iommu: exynos: remove excessive includes and sort others alphabetically Marek Szyprowski
2015-01-23 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 17/18] iommu: exynos: init from dt-specific callback instead of initcall Marek Szyprowski
2015-01-23 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 18/18] iommu: exynos: add callback for initializing devices from device tree Marek Szyprowski
2015-02-04  9:53 ` [PATCH v5 00/18] Exynos SYSMMU (IOMMU) integration with DT and DMA-mapping subsystem Hongbo Zhang
2015-02-04 13:54   ` Marek Szyprowski
2015-02-04 14:21 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-04-17 14:33   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-04-17 14:48     ` Marek Szyprowski
2015-04-17 16:15       ` Javier Martinez Canillas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150126110059.GC30345@8bytes.org \
    --to=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).