From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 08:18:59 -0800 Subject: Clock Regression in next-20150130 caused by cb75a8fcd14e In-Reply-To: <20150201232636.421.58980@quantum> References: <20150131010443.GE16250@atomide.com> <20150201232636.421.58980@quantum> Message-ID: <20150202161858.GH16250@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Mike Turquette [150201 15:29]: > Quoting Tony Lindgren (2015-01-30 17:04:44) > > Hi all, > > > > Looks like commit cb75a8fcd14e ("clk: Add rate constraints to clocks") > > causes a regression on at least omaps where the serial console either > > does not show anything, or just prints garbage. > > > > Reverting cb75a8fcd14e makes things work again on next-20150130. > > > > Any ideas? > > Stephen posted a patch[0] to fix this. I've squashed that into Tomeu's > commit that you reference above and my Panda board is booting fine once > again. > > [0] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<20150131013158.GA4323@codeaurora.org> > > Please let me know if any other issues pop up. There are new WARNs for > OMAP3+ boards introduced by a different patch from Tomeu, but this is > really because the OMAP DPLL and FAPLL code are dereferencing struct clk > pointers when they should not be and is a separate issue from the > constraints patch (with a separate email thread). Seems Linux next is broken again. Now we omaps get tons of: clock: dpll_abe_ck failed transition to 'locked' WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at drivers/clk/clk.c:925 clk_disable+0x28/0x34() and WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c:436 omap3_noncore_dpll_enable+0xdc/0x10c() Regards, Tony