From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: hch@lst.de (hch at lst.de)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 17:26:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] phy: qcom-ufs: export symbols needed by main drivers
In-Reply-To: <1422891069.2103.1.camel@parallels.com>
References: <1840882.huchmEIh5K@wuerfel>
 <1422891069.2103.1.camel@parallels.com>
Message-ID: <20150202162648.GA20465@lst.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 03:30:27PM +0000, James Bottomley wrote:
> Cc added for linux-scsi, since this is the origin of the problem.  How
> important is bisectability in this?  It won't affect any non-embedded
> user, since most don't build with UFS, so I can go either way on folding
> or just applying as an extra patch.

The CRYPTO_DEV_QCOM_ICE symbol was never defined in the scsi trees, and
would have needed something else from linux-next to even compile.  So I
don't think the revert is a problem at all, and I'll add it to the
scsi-for-3.20 branch ASAP.