From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: ask for help about swiotlb buffer is full
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 18:24:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150202182435.GH22661@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54CC5346.5070402@huawei.com>
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 04:00:06AM +0000, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> On 2015-01-30 19:59, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:19:16AM +0000, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> >> On 2015-01-30 18:08, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> >>> There is an AHCI compliant SATA controller in our arm64 soc, and
> >>> it only supports 32bit DMA(used coherent dma_ops). It works well
> >>> in v3.16. Recently, we update kernel from linux v3.16 to linux
> >>> v3.19-rc4(use defconfig in arm64), but we get errors when test
> >>> sata driver, as follows.
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> ahci b1002800.sata: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 65536 bytes)
> >>> DMA: Out of SW-IOMMU space for 65536 bytes at device b1002800.sata
> >
> > Do you use a 64KB page kernel configuration?
> >
> > What does your kernel log say about "software IO TLB [mem ...]"?
> >
>
> 4kb page, use Make ARCH=arm64 defconfig in v3.19 to generate config.
>
> [ 0.678293] software IO TLB [mem 0x7e800000-0x7ec00000] (4MB) mapped at [ffffffc07e800000-ffffffc07ebfffff]
> [ 0.686991] DMA: preallocated 256 KiB pool for atomic allocations
Was the swiotlb buffer size the same in the 3.16 kernel? The only thing
I recall adding was the atomic pool allocations but these are only for
non-coherent DMA ops and only for dma_alloc/free. I assume, in the case
of SATA, the failure is on the dma_map_sg() path.
Maybe with a 3.19 kernel you get more than 4MB swiotlb buffers used at a
time with your tests; can you try increasing this via a kernel command
like to, let's say, 8MB? If I got my calculations correctly (an IO TLB
slab is 1 << 11):
swiotlb=4096
If it still runs out with bigger buffers, we may need to look into
potential leaks.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-02 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <54CB5820.9020102@huawei.com>
2015-01-30 10:19 ` ask for help about swiotlb buffer is full Kefeng Wang
2015-01-30 10:44 ` Robin Murphy
2015-01-31 3:33 ` Kefeng Wang
2015-01-30 11:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-01-31 4:00 ` Kefeng Wang
2015-02-02 18:24 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2015-02-04 12:01 ` Kefeng Wang
2015-02-04 13:32 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-02-04 14:48 ` Ding Tianhong
2015-02-05 18:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-02-07 1:53 ` Kefeng Wang
2015-02-09 16:50 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150202182435.GH22661@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).