[PATCH v8 13/21] ARM64 / ACPI: Parse MADT for SMP initialization

Hanjun Guo
2015-02-04T09:05:13Z

On 2015?02?03? 21:53, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 12:45:41PM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> MADT contains the information for MPIDR which is essential for
>> SMP initialization, parse the GIC cpu interface structures to
>> get the MPIDR value and map it to cpu_logical_map(), and add
>> enabled cpu with valid MPIDR into cpu_possible_map.
>>
>> ACPI 5.1 only has two explicit methods to boot up SMP, PSCI and
>> Parking protocol, but the Parking protocol is only specified for
>> ARMv7 now, so make PSCI as the only way for the SMP boot protocol
>> before some updates for the ACPI spec or the Parking protocol spec.
>>
>> Parking protocol patches for SMP boot will be sent to upstream when
>> the new version of Parking protocol is ready.
>>
>> CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
>> CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>> CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>> Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
>> Tested-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
>> Tested-by: Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@redhat.com>
>> Tested-by: Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>
>> Tested-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h | 2 +
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu_ops.h | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h | 5 +-
>> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 150 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 7 +-
>> arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
>> 7 files changed, 161 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> [...]
>
>> +/**
>> + * acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface - generates a logical cpu number
>> + * and map to MPIDR represented by GICC structure
>> + * @mpidr: CPU's hardware id to register, MPIDR represented in MADT
>> + * @enabled: this cpu is enabled or not
>> + *
>> + * Returns the logical cpu number which maps to MPIDR
>> + */
>> +static int __init acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface(u64 mpidr, u8 enabled)
>> +{
>> + int cpu;
>> +
>> + if (mpidr == INVALID_HWID) {
>> + pr_info("Skip MADT cpu entry with invalid MPIDR\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + total_cpus++;
>> + if (!enabled)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (enabled_cpus >= NR_CPUS) {
>> + pr_warn("NR_CPUS limit of %d reached, Processor %d/0x%llx ignored.\n",
>> + NR_CPUS, total_cpus, mpidr);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* No need to check duplicate MPIDRs for the first CPU */
>> + if (enabled_cpus) {
>> + /*
>> + * Duplicate MPIDRs are a recipe for disaster. Scan
>> + * all initialized entries and check for
>> + * duplicates. If any is found just ignore the CPU.
>> + */
>> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> + if (cpu_logical_map(cpu) == mpidr) {
>> + pr_err("Firmware bug, duplicate CPU MPIDR: 0x%llx in MADT\n",
>> + mpidr);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* allocate a logical cpu id for the new comer */
>> + cpu = cpumask_next_zero(-1, cpu_possible_mask);
>> + } else {
>> + /*
>> + * First GICC entry must be BSP as ACPI spec said
>> + * in section 5.2.12.15
>> + */
>> + if (cpu_logical_map(0) != mpidr) {
>> + pr_err("First GICC entry with MPIDR 0x%llx is not BSP\n",
>> + mpidr);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * boot_cpu_init() already hold bit 0 in cpu_possible_mask
>> + * for BSP, no need to allocate again.
>> + */
>> + cpu = 0;
>> + }
>
> If/when kexec comes, on systems where CPU0 can be hotplugged the next
> kernel might boot on an AP rather than the BSP.

so cpu_logical_map(0) will be the MPIDR of AP which boot the kernel,
then it will not equal to mpidr provided in the first entry of MADT,
right?

It seems that DT smp init will have the same problem, could you give me
some guidance how it solved?

> Is there a requirement
> Linux-side that CPU0 is the BSP, or is this just intended as a sanity
> check of the tables the FW provided?

It is just the check of the table that the FW provided, so in this
kexec case, I think this code need to be reworked.

On x86, no check for the first LAPIC entry must be BSP, I think we
need to remove the check for ARM64 too if it makes sense.

>
>> +
>> + if (!acpi_psci_present())
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +
>> + cpu_ops[cpu] = cpu_get_ops("psci");
>> + /* CPU 0 was already initialized */
>> + if (cpu) {
>> + if (!cpu_ops[cpu])
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (cpu_ops[cpu]->cpu_init(NULL, cpu))
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +
>> + /* map the logical cpu id to cpu MPIDR */
>> + cpu_logical_map(cpu) = mpidr;
>> +
>> + set_cpu_possible(cpu, true);
>> + }
>
> In the OF case we only set CPUs possible once we've scanned all the
> nodes, and only when the boot CPU was actually found in a table. We
> should keep the ACPI case consistent with that.
>
> Can we not handle all of this in a later call once we've scanned all of
> the GICC structures?

we can. the code will be same as DT ones, when all the structures
are scanned, we can add the init code in acpi_init_cpus():

for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++)
if (cpu_logical_map(i) != INVALID_HWID)
set_cpu_possible(i, true);

but I think there is no difference for the logic, maybe I missed
something.

>
> [...]
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
>> index 43ae914..1099ddc 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
>> @@ -449,13 +449,16 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>> if (acpi_disabled) {
>> unflatten_device_tree();
>> psci_dt_init();
>> + cpu_read_bootcpu_ops();
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> + of_smp_init_cpus();
>> +#endif
>
> I was going to say that it would be a little nicer if we had empty stubs
> for functions in the !SMP case, rather than #ifdefs all over the place.
> Unfortunately it looks like the way asm/smp.h is handled is generally a
> mess, so this isn't so bad for now.

Yes, head file asm/smp.h which includes of_smp_init_cpus() only
compiled with CONFIG_SMP correctly.

Thanks
Hanjun