From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?=) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 11:59:51 +0100 Subject: imx_v6_v7_defconfig needs lzop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20150205105951.GU10842@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello, On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 03:41:45PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven > > wrote: > >> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/12358024/ > >> > >> /bin/sh: 1: lzop: not found > >> cat: write error: Broken pipe > >> make[3]: *** [arch/arm/boot/compressed/piggy.lzo] Error 1 > > > > Isn't this error happening due to the lack of 'lzop' package installed > > on the host machine? > > Indeed. I guess you don't want to ask for help or report a build breakage, but question if it's sensible to let a defconfig depend on a host tool that isn't commonly installed, right? Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |