From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 17:11:59 +0000 Subject: [PATCH baohua] ASoC: sirf: atlas7: atlas7_iacc_dai_ops can be static In-Reply-To: <20150205170352.GA49811@snb> References: <201502060130.hszyNa1F%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <20150205170352.GA49811@snb> Message-ID: <20150205171159.GY21293@sirena.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 01:03:52AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > sound/soc/sirf/atlas7-iacc.c:168:24: sparse: symbol 'atlas7_iacc_dai_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? This file isn't in an upstream tree, should this patch have been sent upstream (I suspect non-upstream trees may need a bit of filtering in the scripts)? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: