From: marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V2 RESEND] clk: mxs: Fix invalid 32-bit access to frac registers
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:07:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201502102307.51740.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOMZO5CYHKCUXyCGzuRaYt_o=ucSmZBwsc8mF84HqaA-+QX15g@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 10:54:52 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> wrote:
> > thanks this is very helpful. I built the linux-next for my Duckbill and
> > add the SSP2 section from imx28-evk.dts into imx28-duckbill.dts.
> >
> > Without my patch i get the following for HW_CLKCTRL_FRAC0:
> >
> > ./memwatch -a 0x800401B0
> >
> > 0x800401b0: 0x5e5b5513
> >
> > With my patch i get:
> >
> > ./memwatch -a 0x800401B0
> >
> > 0x800401b0: 0x5e1b5513
> >
> > So it looks like a problem in my patch.
>
> Yes, let's try to get the same value HW_CLKCTRL_FRAC0.
>
> > I orded such a flash chip, but it will take some time until i can use it
> > with my hardware.
>
> Thanks for doing this.
>
> Maybe if you find out a way to fix the calculation of
> HW_CLKCTRL_FRAC0, then I can test it on my board.
Hi,
the difference is this 0x40 bit, right ? That's _STABLE bit, so it means
the clock are not stable, right ? Why would that happen in the first place?
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-10 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-30 19:20 [PATCH V2 RESEND] clk: mxs: Fix invalid 32-bit access to frac registers Stefan Wahren
2015-01-30 19:28 ` Fabio Estevam
2015-02-03 21:08 ` Mike Turquette
2015-02-10 12:52 ` Fabio Estevam
2015-02-10 13:05 ` Stefan Wahren
2015-02-10 13:09 ` Fabio Estevam
2015-02-10 13:55 ` Stefan Wahren
2015-02-10 15:06 ` Fabio Estevam
2015-02-10 21:24 ` Stefan Wahren
2015-02-10 21:54 ` Fabio Estevam
2015-02-10 22:07 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2015-02-11 2:24 ` Mike Turquette
2015-02-11 16:58 ` Fabio Estevam
2015-02-11 20:31 ` Stefan Wahren
2015-02-11 21:10 ` Fabio Estevam
2015-02-12 18:59 ` Stefan Wahren
2015-02-12 19:08 ` Fabio Estevam
2015-02-16 20:24 ` Stefan Wahren
2015-02-17 8:09 ` Marek Vasut
2015-02-20 11:09 ` Stefan Wahren
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-01-30 19:14 Stefan Wahren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201502102307.51740.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).