From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: peterz@infradead.org (Peter Zijlstra)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 10:11:59 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/5] irqchip: Add DT binding doc for the virtual irq
 demuxer chip
In-Reply-To: <20150210204835.GL9432@leverpostej>
References: <1422527620-8308-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
 <1422527620-8308-4-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
 <20150210153628.GF9432@leverpostej>
 <20150210165201.634bc04b@bbrezillon>
 <20150210204835.GL9432@leverpostej>
Message-ID: <20150211091159.GE7119@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 08:48:36PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> From f390ccbb31f06efee49b4469943c8d85d963bfb5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:14:33 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] genirq: allow mixed IRQF_NO_SUSPEND requests
> 
> In some cases a physical IRQ line may be shared between devices from
> which we expect interrupts during suspend (e.g. timers) and those we do
> not (e.g. anything we cut the power to). Where a driver did not request
> the interrupt with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND, it's unlikely that it can handle
> being called during suspend, and it may bring down the system.
> 
> This patch adds logic to automatically mark the irqactions for these
> potentially unsafe handlers as disabled during suspend, leaving actions
> with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND enabled. If an interrupt is raised on a shared line
> during suspend, only the handlers requested with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND will be
> called. The handlers requested without IRQF_NO_SUSPEND will be skipped
> as if they had immediately returned IRQF_NONE.
> 
> Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
> Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Aw gawd.. not that again.

So Rafael and tglx went over this a few months ago I think:

  lkml.kernel.org/r/26580319.OZP7jvJnA9 at vostro.rjw.lan

is the last series I could find. Maybe Rafael can summarize?