From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 10:20:09 +0000 Subject: Announce: rmk's nightly builder gets ARM64 support In-Reply-To: <20150220094035.GE8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20150219171220.GA8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20150219183444.GB8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20150220092003.GB31692@arm.com> <20150220094035.GE8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20150220102009.GF8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:40:35AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:24:39AM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > Yes, this looks like a GCC problem, not binutils, since there are > > other .S files in the same folder that contain crypto instructions > > that build fine. This particular one is a .c file with AES > > instructions in inline asm() (and we pass -march=armv8-a+crypto) > > Maybe we need to get jk's blog post updated - it's currently on of > the top hits in google, so this is probably going to trip up a lot of > people if they follow the instructions there. > > http://jk.ozlabs.org/docs/arm64-toolchain/ > > So it sounds like possibly the binutils part of those instructions is > fine, it's the gcc part which isn't. Note that it would also be useful to know where to get a working gcc from (preferably in source form - I doubt there's any Fedora 14 binaries around.) -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.