linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: drjones@redhat.com (Andrew Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC/RFT PATCH 0/3] arm64: KVM: work around incoherency with uncached guest mappings
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 16:36:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150220153626.GB10942@hawk.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu-YUzmnACZQi98OPRgKKL+gAGqwWYq2-_dwCdNqcktNUg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 02:37:25PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 20 February 2015 at 14:29, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> wrote:
> > So looks like the 3 orders of magnitude greater number of traps
> > (only to el2) don't impact kernel compiles.
> >
> 
> OK, good! That was what I was hoping for, obviously.
> 
> > Then I thought I'd be able to quick measure the number of cycles
> > a trap to el2 takes with this kvm-unit-tests test
> >
> > int main(void)
> > {
> >         unsigned long start, end;
> >         unsigned int sctlr;
> >
> >         asm volatile(
> >         "       mrs %0, sctlr_el1\n"
> >         "       msr pmcr_el0, %1\n"
> >         : "=&r" (sctlr) : "r" (5));
> >
> >         asm volatile(
> >         "       mrs %0, pmccntr_el0\n"
> >         "       msr sctlr_el1, %2\n"
> >         "       mrs %1, pmccntr_el0\n"
> >         : "=&r" (start), "=&r" (end) : "r" (sctlr));
> >
> >         printf("%llx\n", end - start);
> >         return 0;
> > }
> >
> > after applying this patch to kvm
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp.S
> > index bb91b6fc63861..5de39d740aa58 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp.S
> > @@ -770,7 +770,7 @@
> >
> >         mrs     x2, mdcr_el2
> >         and     x2, x2, #MDCR_EL2_HPMN_MASK
> > -       orr     x2, x2, #(MDCR_EL2_TPM | MDCR_EL2_TPMCR)
> > +//     orr     x2, x2, #(MDCR_EL2_TPM | MDCR_EL2_TPMCR)
> >         orr     x2, x2, #(MDCR_EL2_TDRA | MDCR_EL2_TDOSA)
> >
> >         // Check for KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY, and set debug to trap
> >
> > But I get zero for the cycle count. Not sure what I'm missing.
> >
> 
> No clue tbh. Does the counter work as expected in the host?
>

Guess not. I dropped the test into a module_init and inserted
it on the host. Always get zero for pmccntr_el0 reads. Or, if
I set it to something non-zero with a write, then I always get
that back - no increments. pmcr_el0 looks OK... I had forgotten
to set bit 31 of pmcntenset_el0, but doing that still doesn't
help. Anyway, I assume the problem is me. I'll keep looking to
see what I'm missing.

drew

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-20 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-19 10:54 [RFC/RFT PATCH 0/3] arm64: KVM: work around incoherency with uncached guest mappings Ard Biesheuvel
2015-02-19 10:54 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH 1/3] arm64: KVM: handle some sysreg writes in EL2 Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-03 17:59   ` Mario Smarduch
2015-02-19 10:54 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH 2/3] arm64: KVM: mangle MAIR register to prevent uncached guest mappings Ard Biesheuvel
2015-02-19 10:54 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH 3/3] arm64: KVM: keep trapping of VM sysreg writes enabled Ard Biesheuvel
2015-02-19 13:40   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-02-19 13:44     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-02-19 15:19       ` Marc Zyngier
2015-02-19 15:22         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-02-19 14:50 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH 0/3] arm64: KVM: work around incoherency with uncached guest mappings Alexander Graf
2015-02-19 14:56   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-02-19 15:27     ` Alexander Graf
2015-02-19 15:31       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-02-19 16:57 ` Andrew Jones
2015-02-19 17:19   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-02-19 17:55     ` Andrew Jones
2015-02-19 17:57       ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-20 14:29         ` Andrew Jones
2015-02-20 14:37           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-02-20 15:36             ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2015-02-24 14:55               ` Andrew Jones
2015-02-24 17:47                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-02-24 19:12                   ` Andrew Jones
2015-03-02 16:31                   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-03-02 16:47                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-02 16:55                       ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-03-02 17:05                         ` Andrew Jones
2015-03-02 16:48                     ` Andrew Jones
2015-03-03  2:20                     ` Mario Smarduch
2015-03-04 11:35                       ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-04 11:50                         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-04 12:29                           ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-04 12:43                             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-04 14:12                               ` Andrew Jones
2015-03-04 14:29                                 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-04 14:34                                   ` Peter Maydell
2015-03-04 17:03                                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-04 17:28                                     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-05 10:12                                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-05 11:04                                         ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-05 11:52                                           ` Peter Maydell
2015-03-05 12:03                                             ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-05 12:26                                               ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-05 14:58                                                 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-05 17:43                                                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-06 21:08                                                     ` Mario Smarduch
2015-03-09 14:26                                                       ` Andrew Jones
2015-03-09 15:33                                                         ` Mario Smarduch
2015-03-05 19:13                                                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-06 20:33                         ` Mario Smarduch
2015-02-19 18:44       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-03 17:34 ` Alexander Graf
2015-03-03 18:13   ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-03-03 20:58     ` Andrew Jones
2015-03-03 18:32 ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150220153626.GB10942@hawk.usersys.redhat.com \
    --to=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).