linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] qcom: scm: Add qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr function
@ 2015-02-27 20:47 Lina Iyer
  2015-02-27 21:33 ` Kumar Gala
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Lina Iyer @ 2015-02-27 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

A core can be powered down for cpuidle or when it is hotplugged off. In
either case, the warmboot return address would be different. Allow
setting the warmboot address for a specific cpu, optimize and write to
the firmware, if the address is different than the previously set
address.

Export qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr function move the warm boot flags to
implementation.

Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/qcom_scm.h    |  5 +----
 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
index 6e7a72b..19133ca 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
@@ -34,6 +34,23 @@
 #define QCOM_SCM_ERROR		-1
 #define QCOM_SCM_INTERRUPTED	1
 
+#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU0	0x04
+#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU1	0x02
+#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU2	0x10
+#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU3	0x40
+
+struct scm_warmboot {
+	int flag;
+	void *entry;
+};
+
+static struct scm_warmboot scm_flags[] = {
+	{ .flag = QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU0 },
+	{ .flag = QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU1 },
+	{ .flag = QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU2 },
+	{ .flag = QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU3 },
+};
+
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(qcom_scm_lock);
 
 /**
@@ -342,3 +359,22 @@ int qcom_scm_set_boot_addr(u32 addr, int flags)
 			&cmd, sizeof(cmd), NULL, 0);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_set_boot_addr);
+
+int qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr(void *entry, int cpu)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	/*
+	 * Reassign only if we are switching from hotplug entry point
+	 * to cpuidle entry point or vice versa.
+	 */
+	if (entry == scm_flags[cpu].entry)
+		return 0;
+
+	ret = qcom_scm_set_boot_addr(virt_to_phys(entry), scm_flags[cpu].flag);
+	if (!ret)
+		scm_flags[cpu].entry  = entry;
+
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr);
diff --git a/include/linux/qcom_scm.h b/include/linux/qcom_scm.h
index 6bb84cf..fc5aae4 100644
--- a/include/linux/qcom_scm.h
+++ b/include/linux/qcom_scm.h
@@ -15,12 +15,9 @@
 #define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_COLDBOOT_CPU1		0x01
 #define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_COLDBOOT_CPU2		0x08
 #define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_COLDBOOT_CPU3		0x20
-#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU0		0x04
-#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU1		0x02
-#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU2		0x10
-#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU3		0x40
 
 extern int qcom_scm_set_boot_addr(u32 addr, int flags);
+extern int qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr(void *entry, int cpu);
 
 #define QCOM_SCM_VERSION(major, minor) (((major) << 16) | ((minor) & 0xFF))
 
-- 
2.1.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2] qcom: scm: Add qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr function
  2015-02-27 20:47 [PATCH v2] qcom: scm: Add qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr function Lina Iyer
@ 2015-02-27 21:33 ` Kumar Gala
  2015-02-27 21:51   ` Lina Iyer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Gala @ 2015-02-27 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel


On Feb 27, 2015, at 2:47 PM, Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org> wrote:

> A core can be powered down for cpuidle or when it is hotplugged off. In
> either case, the warmboot return address would be different. Allow
> setting the warmboot address for a specific cpu, optimize and write to
> the firmware, if the address is different than the previously set
> address.
> 
> Export qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr function move the warm boot flags to
> implementation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/qcom_scm.h    |  5 +----
> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
> index 6e7a72b..19133ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,23 @@
> #define QCOM_SCM_ERROR		-1
> #define QCOM_SCM_INTERRUPTED	1
> 
> +#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU0	0x04
> +#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU1	0x02
> +#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU2	0x10
> +#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU3	0x40
> +
> +struct scm_warmboot {
> +	int flag;
> +	void *entry;
> +};
> +
> +static struct scm_warmboot scm_flags[] = {
> +	{ .flag = QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU0 },
> +	{ .flag = QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU1 },
> +	{ .flag = QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU2 },
> +	{ .flag = QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU3 },
> +};
> +
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(qcom_scm_lock);
> 
> /**
> @@ -342,3 +359,22 @@ int qcom_scm_set_boot_addr(u32 addr, int flags)
> 			&cmd, sizeof(cmd), NULL, 0);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_set_boot_addr);
> +

Since you are adding a new interface, can you add Kdoc style comment header.  I need to do this for the other interfaces as well.

> +int qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr(void *entry, int cpu)

I?d really like to see if we could make the set_boot_addr and set_warm_boot_addr have the same interfaces.

> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Reassign only if we are switching from hotplug entry point
> +	 * to cpuidle entry point or vice versa.
> +	 */
> +	if (entry == scm_flags[cpu].entry)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	ret = qcom_scm_set_boot_addr(virt_to_phys(entry), scm_flags[cpu].flag);
> +	if (!ret)
> +		scm_flags[cpu].entry  = entry;
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr);
> diff --git a/include/linux/qcom_scm.h b/include/linux/qcom_scm.h
> index 6bb84cf..fc5aae4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/qcom_scm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/qcom_scm.h
> @@ -15,12 +15,9 @@
> #define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_COLDBOOT_CPU1		0x01
> #define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_COLDBOOT_CPU2		0x08
> #define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_COLDBOOT_CPU3		0x20
> -#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU0		0x04
> -#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU1		0x02
> -#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU2		0x10
> -#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU3		0x40
> 
> extern int qcom_scm_set_boot_addr(u32 addr, int flags);
> +extern int qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr(void *entry, int cpu);
> 
> #define QCOM_SCM_VERSION(major, minor) (((major) << 16) | ((minor) & 0xFF))
> 
> -- 
> 2.1.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2] qcom: scm: Add qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr function
  2015-02-27 21:33 ` Kumar Gala
@ 2015-02-27 21:51   ` Lina Iyer
  2015-02-27 22:01     ` Kumar Gala
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Lina Iyer @ 2015-02-27 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Fri, Feb 27 2015 at 14:33 -0700, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
>On Feb 27, 2015, at 2:47 PM, Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>> A core can be powered down for cpuidle or when it is hotplugged off. In
>> either case, the warmboot return address would be different. Allow
>> setting the warmboot address for a specific cpu, optimize and write to
>> the firmware, if the address is different than the previously set
>> address.
>>
>> Export qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr function move the warm boot flags to
>> implementation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/qcom_scm.h    |  5 +----
>> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
>> index 6e7a72b..19133ca 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
>> @@ -34,6 +34,23 @@
>> #define QCOM_SCM_ERROR		-1
>> #define QCOM_SCM_INTERRUPTED	1
>>
>> +#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU0	0x04
>> +#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU1	0x02
>> +#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU2	0x10
>> +#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU3	0x40
>> +
>> +struct scm_warmboot {
>> +	int flag;
>> +	void *entry;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct scm_warmboot scm_flags[] = {
>> +	{ .flag = QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU0 },
>> +	{ .flag = QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU1 },
>> +	{ .flag = QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU2 },
>> +	{ .flag = QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU3 },
>> +};
>> +
>> static DEFINE_MUTEX(qcom_scm_lock);
>>
>> /**
>> @@ -342,3 +359,22 @@ int qcom_scm_set_boot_addr(u32 addr, int flags)
>> 			&cmd, sizeof(cmd), NULL, 0);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_set_boot_addr);
>> +
>
>Since you are adding a new interface, can you add Kdoc style comment header.  I need to do this for the other interfaces as well.

OK.

>
>> +int qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr(void *entry, int cpu)
>
>I?d really like to see if we could make the set_boot_addr and set_warm_boot_addr have the same interfaces.

I am working on making the interfaces similar. There is some check in
the platsmp.c that uses the cold boot flag array to determine the
present cpus. Do you think, we can ignore that check over there? If that
can be done, I will change the interface for cold boot too.
>
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Reassign only if we are switching from hotplug entry point
>> +	 * to cpuidle entry point or vice versa.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (entry == scm_flags[cpu].entry)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	ret = qcom_scm_set_boot_addr(virt_to_phys(entry), scm_flags[cpu].flag);
>> +	if (!ret)
>> +		scm_flags[cpu].entry  = entry;
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr);
>> diff --git a/include/linux/qcom_scm.h b/include/linux/qcom_scm.h
>> index 6bb84cf..fc5aae4 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/qcom_scm.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/qcom_scm.h
>> @@ -15,12 +15,9 @@
>> #define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_COLDBOOT_CPU1		0x01
>> #define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_COLDBOOT_CPU2		0x08
>> #define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_COLDBOOT_CPU3		0x20
>> -#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU0		0x04
>> -#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU1		0x02
>> -#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU2		0x10
>> -#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU3		0x40
>>
>> extern int qcom_scm_set_boot_addr(u32 addr, int flags);
>> +extern int qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr(void *entry, int cpu);
>>
>> #define QCOM_SCM_VERSION(major, minor) (((major) << 16) | ((minor) & 0xFF))
>>
>> --
>> 2.1.0
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>-- 
>Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
>The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
>a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2] qcom: scm: Add qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr function
  2015-02-27 21:51   ` Lina Iyer
@ 2015-02-27 22:01     ` Kumar Gala
  2015-02-27 22:07       ` Kumar Gala
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Gala @ 2015-02-27 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel


On Feb 27, 2015, at 3:51 PM, Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 27 2015 at 14:33 -0700, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> 
>> On Feb 27, 2015, at 2:47 PM, Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> A core can be powered down for cpuidle or when it is hotplugged off. In
>>> either case, the warmboot return address would be different. Allow
>>> setting the warmboot address for a specific cpu, optimize and write to
>>> the firmware, if the address is different than the previously set
>>> address.
>>> 
>>> Export qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr function move the warm boot flags to
>>> implementation.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> include/linux/qcom_scm.h    |  5 +----
>>> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
>>> index 6e7a72b..19133ca 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
>>> @@ -34,6 +34,23 @@
>>> #define QCOM_SCM_ERROR		-1
>>> #define QCOM_SCM_INTERRUPTED	1
>>> 
>>> +#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU0	0x04
>>> +#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU1	0x02
>>> +#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU2	0x10
>>> +#define QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU3	0x40
>>> +
>>> +struct scm_warmboot {
>>> +	int flag;
>>> +	void *entry;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static struct scm_warmboot scm_flags[] = {
>>> +	{ .flag = QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU0 },
>>> +	{ .flag = QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU1 },
>>> +	{ .flag = QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU2 },
>>> +	{ .flag = QCOM_SCM_FLAG_WARMBOOT_CPU3 },
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> static DEFINE_MUTEX(qcom_scm_lock);
>>> 
>>> /**
>>> @@ -342,3 +359,22 @@ int qcom_scm_set_boot_addr(u32 addr, int flags)
>>> 			&cmd, sizeof(cmd), NULL, 0);
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_set_boot_addr);
>>> +
>> 
>> Since you are adding a new interface, can you add Kdoc style comment header.  I need to do this for the other interfaces as well.
> 
> OK.
> 
>> 
>>> +int qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr(void *entry, int cpu)
>> 
>> I?d really like to see if we could make the set_boot_addr and set_warm_boot_addr have the same interfaces.
> 
> I am working on making the interfaces similar. There is some check in
> the platsmp.c that uses the cold boot flag array to determine the
> present cpus. Do you think, we can ignore that check over there? If that
> can be done, I will change the interface for cold boot too.

I don?t see any reason we can?t add qcom_scm_set_cold_boot_addr() move the flags such that they only exist in qcom_scm_set_boot_addr and make qcom_scm_set_boot_addr static.

- k

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2] qcom: scm: Add qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr function
  2015-02-27 22:01     ` Kumar Gala
@ 2015-02-27 22:07       ` Kumar Gala
  2015-02-27 22:11         ` Lina Iyer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Gala @ 2015-02-27 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

>>>> +int qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr(void *entry, int cpu)
>>> 
>>> I?d really like to see if we could make the set_boot_addr and set_warm_boot_addr have the same interfaces.
>> 
>> I am working on making the interfaces similar. There is some check in
>> the platsmp.c that uses the cold boot flag array to determine the
>> present cpus. Do you think, we can ignore that check over there? If that
>> can be done, I will change the interface for cold boot too.
> 
> I don?t see any reason we can?t add qcom_scm_set_cold_boot_addr() move the flags such that they only exist in qcom_scm_set_boot_addr and make qcom_scm_set_boot_addr static.
> 
> - k

Looking at this for another minute, I think we should have the interfaces be something like:

qcom_scm_set_cold_boot_addr(void * entry, cpumask_t mask);
qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr(void * entry, cpumask_t mask);

- k

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2] qcom: scm: Add qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr function
  2015-02-27 22:07       ` Kumar Gala
@ 2015-02-27 22:11         ` Lina Iyer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Lina Iyer @ 2015-02-27 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Fri, Feb 27 2015 at 15:07 -0700, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>>> +int qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr(void *entry, int cpu)
>>>>
>>>> I?d really like to see if we could make the set_boot_addr and set_warm_boot_addr have the same interfaces.
>>>
>>> I am working on making the interfaces similar. There is some check in
>>> the platsmp.c that uses the cold boot flag array to determine the
>>> present cpus. Do you think, we can ignore that check over there? If that
>>> can be done, I will change the interface for cold boot too.
>>
>> I don?t see any reason we can?t add qcom_scm_set_cold_boot_addr() move the flags such that they only exist in qcom_scm_set_boot_addr and make qcom_scm_set_boot_addr static.
>>
>> - k
>
>Looking at this for another minute, I think we should have the interfaces be something like:
>
>qcom_scm_set_cold_boot_addr(void * entry, cpumask_t mask);
>qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr(void * entry, cpumask_t mask);

Very similar to what I was thinking. I will send another patchest when I
get to it.

>
>- k
>
>-- 
>Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
>The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
>a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-02-27 22:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-02-27 20:47 [PATCH v2] qcom: scm: Add qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr function Lina Iyer
2015-02-27 21:33 ` Kumar Gala
2015-02-27 21:51   ` Lina Iyer
2015-02-27 22:01     ` Kumar Gala
2015-02-27 22:07       ` Kumar Gala
2015-02-27 22:11         ` Lina Iyer

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).