linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] arm/arm64: KVM: Keep elrsr/aisr in sync with software model
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 13:37:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150228133748.16899e63@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424878582-26397-5-git-send-email-alex.bennee@linaro.org>

On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:36:22 +0000
Alex Benn?e <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:

> From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> 
> There is an interesting bug in the vgic code, which manifests itself
> when the KVM run loop has a signal pending or needs a vmid generation
> rollover after having disabled interrupts but before actually
> switching to the guest.
> 
> In this case, we flush the vgic as usual, but we sync back the vgic
> state and exit to userspace before entering the guest.  The
> consequence is that we will be syncing the list registers back to the
> software model using the GICH_ELRSR and GICH_EISR from the last
> execution of the guest, potentially overwriting a list register
> containing an interrupt.
> 
> This showed up during migration testing where we would capture a state
> where the VM has masked the arch timer but there were no interrupts,
> resulting in a hung test.
> 
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Reported-by: Alex Bennee <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Benn?e <alex.bennee@linaro.org>

Looks OK to me.

Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> index 7042251..e2a676e 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ struct vgic_ops {
>  	void	(*sync_lr_elrsr)(struct kvm_vcpu *, int, struct
> vgic_lr); u64	(*get_elrsr)(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  	u64	(*get_eisr)(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +	void	(*clear_eisr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  	u32	(*get_interrupt_status)(const struct kvm_vcpu
> *vcpu); void	(*enable_underflow)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  	void	(*disable_underflow)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v2.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v2.c
> index a0a7b5d..f9b9c7c 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v2.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v2.c
> @@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ static void vgic_v2_sync_lr_elrsr(struct kvm_vcpu
> *vcpu, int lr, {
>  	if (!(lr_desc.state & LR_STATE_MASK))
>  		vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2.vgic_elrsr |= (1ULL <<
> lr);
> +	else
> +		vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2.vgic_elrsr &= ~(1ULL <<
> lr); }
>  
>  static u64 vgic_v2_get_elrsr(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> @@ -84,6 +86,11 @@ static u64 vgic_v2_get_eisr(const struct kvm_vcpu
> *vcpu) return vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2.vgic_eisr;
>  }
>  
> +static void vgic_v2_clear_eisr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2.vgic_eisr = 0;
> +}
> +
>  static u32 vgic_v2_get_interrupt_status(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	u32 misr = vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2.vgic_misr;
> @@ -148,6 +155,7 @@ static const struct vgic_ops vgic_v2_ops = {
>  	.sync_lr_elrsr		= vgic_v2_sync_lr_elrsr,
>  	.get_elrsr		= vgic_v2_get_elrsr,
>  	.get_eisr		= vgic_v2_get_eisr,
> +	.clear_eisr		= vgic_v2_clear_eisr,
>  	.get_interrupt_status	= vgic_v2_get_interrupt_status,
>  	.enable_underflow	= vgic_v2_enable_underflow,
>  	.disable_underflow	= vgic_v2_disable_underflow,
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3.c
> index 3a62d8a..dff0602 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3.c
> @@ -104,6 +104,8 @@ static void vgic_v3_sync_lr_elrsr(struct kvm_vcpu
> *vcpu, int lr, {
>  	if (!(lr_desc.state & LR_STATE_MASK))
>  		vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.vgic_elrsr |= (1U << lr);
> +	else
> +		vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.vgic_elrsr &= ~(1U <<
> lr); }
>  
>  static u64 vgic_v3_get_elrsr(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> @@ -116,6 +118,11 @@ static u64 vgic_v3_get_eisr(const struct
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu) return vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.vgic_eisr;
>  }
>  
> +static void vgic_v3_clear_eisr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.vgic_eisr = 0;
> +}
> +
>  static u32 vgic_v3_get_interrupt_status(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	u32 misr = vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.vgic_misr;
> @@ -192,6 +199,7 @@ static const struct vgic_ops vgic_v3_ops = {
>  	.sync_lr_elrsr		= vgic_v3_sync_lr_elrsr,
>  	.get_elrsr		= vgic_v3_get_elrsr,
>  	.get_eisr		= vgic_v3_get_eisr,
> +	.clear_eisr		= vgic_v3_clear_eisr,
>  	.get_interrupt_status	= vgic_v3_get_interrupt_status,
>  	.enable_underflow	= vgic_v3_enable_underflow,
>  	.disable_underflow	= vgic_v3_disable_underflow,
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> index 3b4ded2..3690c1e 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> @@ -980,6 +980,11 @@ static inline u64 vgic_get_eisr(struct kvm_vcpu
> *vcpu) return vgic_ops->get_eisr(vcpu);
>  }
>  
> +static inline void vgic_clear_eisr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	vgic_ops->clear_eisr(vcpu);
> +}
> +
>  static inline u32 vgic_get_interrupt_status(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	return vgic_ops->get_interrupt_status(vcpu);
> @@ -1019,6 +1024,7 @@ static void vgic_retire_lr(int lr_nr, int irq,
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) vgic_set_lr(vcpu, lr_nr, vlr);
>  	clear_bit(lr_nr, vgic_cpu->lr_used);
>  	vgic_cpu->vgic_irq_lr_map[irq] = LR_EMPTY;
> +	vgic_sync_lr_elrsr(vcpu, lr_nr, vlr);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -1063,6 +1069,7 @@ static void vgic_queue_irq_to_lr(struct
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq, vlr.state |= LR_EOI_INT;
>  
>  	vgic_set_lr(vcpu, lr_nr, vlr);
> +	vgic_sync_lr_elrsr(vcpu, lr_nr, vlr);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -1258,6 +1265,14 @@ static bool vgic_process_maintenance(struct
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu) if (status & INT_STATUS_UNDERFLOW)
>  		vgic_disable_underflow(vcpu);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * In the next iterations of the vcpu loop, if we sync the
> vgic state
> +	 * after flushing it, but before entering the guest (this
> happens for
> +	 * pending signals and vmid rollovers), then make sure we
> don't pick
> +	 * up any old maintenance interrupts here.
> +	 */
> +	vgic_clear_eisr(vcpu);
> +
>  	return level_pending;
>  }
>  



-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.

      reply	other threads:[~2015-02-28 13:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-25 15:36 [PATCH 0/4] KVM ARM64 Migration Fixes Alex Bennée
2015-02-25 15:36 ` [PATCH 1/4] arm: KVM: export vcpi->pause state via MP_STATE ioctls Alex Bennée
2015-02-25 15:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm/arm64: KVM: Implement support for unqueueing active IRQs Alex Bennée
2015-02-25 15:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm/arm64: KVM: Fix migration race in the arch timer Alex Bennée
2015-02-28 13:30   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-03-02  8:50     ` Alex Bennée
2015-03-02  9:12       ` Marc Zyngier
2015-03-02 14:20         ` Alex Bennée
2015-02-25 15:36 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm/arm64: KVM: Keep elrsr/aisr in sync with software model Alex Bennée
2015-02-28 13:37   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150228133748.16899e63@arm.com \
    --to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).