From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] iommu/arm-smmu: fix ARM_SMMU_FEAT_TRANS_OPS condition
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 18:32:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150304183258.GN17250@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425484266-5449-1-git-send-email-b.reynal@virtualopensystems.com>
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 03:51:06PM +0000, Baptiste Reynal wrote:
> This patch is a fix to "iommu/arm-smmu: add support for iova_to_phys
> through ATS1PR".
> According to ARM documentation, translation registers are optional even
> in SMMUv1, so ID0_S1TS needs to be checked to verify their presence.
> Also, we check that the domain is a stage-1 domain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baptiste Reynal <b.reynal@virtualopensystems.com>
>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> Add domain stage test (Thanks to Will Deacon)
>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> index fc13dd5..a3adde6 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -1288,10 +1288,13 @@ static phys_addr_t arm_smmu_iova_to_phys(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> return 0;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&smmu_domain->pgtbl_lock, flags);
> - if (smmu_domain->smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_TRANS_OPS)
> + if (smmu_domain->smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_TRANS_OPS &&
> + smmu_domain->stage == ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1) {
> ret = arm_smmu_iova_to_phys_hard(domain, iova);
> - else
> + } else {
> ret = ops->iova_to_phys(ops, iova);
> + }
> +
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&smmu_domain->pgtbl_lock, flags);
>
> return ret;
> @@ -1556,7 +1559,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_cfg_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> - if (smmu->version == 1 || (!(id & ID0_ATOSNS) && (id & ID0_S1TS))) {
> + if ((id & ID0_S1TS) && ((smmu->version == 1) || (id & ID0_ATOSNS))) {
> smmu->features |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_TRANS_OPS;
> dev_notice(smmu->dev, "\taddress translation ops\n");
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Sorry Joerg, but this is the latest in the drip of ARM SMMU fixes for
4.0! Please pick it up with the rest.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-04 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-04 15:51 [PATCH v2 1/1] iommu/arm-smmu: fix ARM_SMMU_FEAT_TRANS_OPS condition Baptiste Reynal
2015-03-04 18:32 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2015-03-23 14:23 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150304183258.GN17250@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).