From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 11:04:11 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] genirq: describe IRQF_COND_SUSPEND
In-Reply-To: <20150304221729.GI3989@piout.net>
References: <1424771762-16343-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
 <8151717.nkhnGBri9h@vostro.rjw.lan>
 <20150226191724.0ae4ca4e@bbrezillon>
 <6864616.1aRDSmSsvx@vostro.rjw.lan>
 <20150304194246.GF22156@leverpostej>
 <20150304200040.GA12126@leverpostej>
 <20150304221729.GI3989@piout.net>
Message-ID: <20150305110411.GC13617@leverpostej>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:17:29PM +0000, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> tiny tiny nitpick:
> 
> On 04/03/2015 at 20:00:40 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote :
> > With certain restrictions it is possible for a wakeup device to share
> > and IRQ with an IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user, and the warnings introduced by
>   ^ an

Whoops.

Rafael, are you happy to fix that up, or would you like me to resend?

> > +In rare cases an IRQ can be shared between a wakeup device driver and an
> > +IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user. In order for this to be safe, the wakeup device driver
> > +must be able to discern spurious IRQs from genuine wakeup events (signalling
> 
> And genuine question, should we use British English or American English
> or we don't care ?

Have I written something that isn't valid American English there? I read
over this a few times and failed to spot anything obvious.

I'm happy to change for consistency, I generally assume that's the most
important thing.

Mark.