From: neilb@suse.de (NeilBrown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: twl4030_charger: need changes to get probed?
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 11:06:53 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150309110653.7532613c@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150307210102.GL5233@earth>
On Sat, 7 Mar 2015 22:01:02 +0100 Sebastian Reichel <sre@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 10:24:17PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > According to n900 dts, twl4030-bci (aka charger) should be
> > included.
>
> its part of twl, but not used on N900 afaik.
>
> > (But it does not seem to do anything useful on n900. I was hoping for
> > measurement of input voltage, but .. no.)
>
> check for rx51-battery.
>
> > Any ideas why the patch below is needed?
>
> platform_driver_probe() does not support deferred probing.
>
> Neil, can you take this patch into your series for the next round?
I could, but I do wonder if it is the right thing to do.
Shouldn't we fix platform_driver_probe() to support deferred probing.
As I understand it, it refused to retry a probe if there is an error, and the
comments suggest that such retrying is avoided because it would be a waste
of time:
/*
* Prevent driver from requesting probe deferral to avoid further
* futile probe attempts.
*/
In this case, it isn't futile.
Earlier there is a comment saying:
* Use this instead of platform_driver_register() when you know the device
* is not hotpluggable and has already been registered, and you want to
* remove its run-once probe() infrastructure from memory after the driver
* has bound to the device.
I presume all this applies. I assume that the only problem is a probe-order
thing. So maybe we should fix platform_driver_probe() to do the right thing
with -EPROBEDEFER??
Trouble is, I really don't understand the point or mechanism for
platform_driver_probe(), so I cannot suggest anything.
But I have been annoyed before that platform_driver_probe doesn't cope with
EPROBEDEFER, so I would like it fixed.
NeilBrown
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150309/74073678/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-09 0:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20150224043341.4243.23291.stgit@notabene.brown>
[not found] ` <20150224043352.4243.11227.stgit@notabene.brown>
[not found] ` <20150305173350.50502b95@notabene.brown>
[not found] ` <20150306212417.GA24169@amd>
2015-03-06 21:57 ` twl4030_charger: need changes to get probed? Pali Rohár
2015-03-06 22:12 ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2015-03-06 22:40 ` Pavel Machek
2015-03-06 22:56 ` Pali Rohár
2015-03-07 15:56 ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2015-03-07 16:43 ` Pali Rohár
2015-04-26 10:13 ` Pavel Machek
2015-03-07 21:01 ` Sebastian Reichel
2015-03-09 0:06 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2015-03-09 11:14 ` Sebastian Reichel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150309110653.7532613c@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).