[PATCH] clk: provide clk_is_match() dummy for non-common clk

[linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)]

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:17:55PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> Hey Russell,
> 
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:22:09AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 10:05:29PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > ARM randconfig build tests found a new error for configurations
> > > with COMMON_CLK disabled but HAS_CLK selected by the platform:
> > > 
> > > ERROR: "clk_is_match" [sound/soc/fsl/snd-soc-fsl-spdif.ko] undefined!
> > > 
> > > This moves the declaration around, so this case is covered
> > > by the existing static inline helper function.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > > Fixes: c69e182e51d89 ("clk: introduce clk_is_match")
> > > ----
> > > BTW, we have a preexisting problem in clk_get_parent,
> > > clk_round_rate and clk_set_parent, which I've worked around in
> > > my randconfig builds so far. Should we do that the same way?
> > 
> > NAK, as Uwe points out, you didn't address my comment.
> You commented on the patch that is c69e182e51d8 ("clk: introduce
> clk_is_match") now in next. Arnd just moved this around.

*Sigh*

Mike - please remove this commit until proper kernel patch process is
honoured.  We'll have some order here, and mutual respect of fellow
kernel developers, rather than people selectively ignoring people.
Yes, I realise that it fixes a bug, but it's utterly disgusting that
comments on a patch are ignored and it's just picked up irrespective
of comments being addressed.

If you don't like that, bloody well do a better job.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.