From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] n_tty: use kmalloc() instead of vmalloc() to avoid crash on armada-xp
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:47:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150311124730.GZ8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55003569.1010200@list.ru>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 03:30:33PM +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> OK, here we go.
>
> [ 0.000000] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0
> [ 0.000000] Linux version 4.0.0-rc2-00137-gb672c98-dirty
> (root at host-010-117) (gcc version 4.6.3 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) )
> #60 SMP5
> [ 0.000000] CPU: ARMv7 Processor [562f5842] revision 2 (ARMv7),
> cr=10c5387d
> [ 0.000000] CPU: PIPT / VIPT nonaliasing data cache, PIPT instruction
> cache
> [ 0.000000] Machine model: Marvell Armada XP Development Board
> DB-MV784MP-GP
> [ 0.000000] Ignoring memory block 0x100000000 - 0x200000000
...
> [ 0.000000] MEMBLOCK configuration:
> [ 0.000000] memory size = 0xf0000000 reserved size = 0xa32442
> [ 0.000000] memory.cnt = 0x1
> [ 0.000000] memory[0x0] [0x00000000000000-0x000000efffffff],
> 0xf0000000 bytes flags: 0x0
So this says you have memory covering that entire range, and actually
beyond to 8GB.
> [ 6.772534] vmalloc: mapping page ef7f13c0 (0x000efc1e000) at 0xf00ca000
> [ 6.772537] vmalloc: mapping page ef7f13a0 (0x000efc1d000) at 0xf00cb000
> [ 6.772540] vmalloc: mapping page ef7f1380 (0x000efc1c000) at 0xf00cc000
> [ 6.772542] vmalloc: mapping page ef7f1360 (0x000efc1b000) at 0xf00cd000
> [ 6.772544] vmalloc: mapping page ef7f1340 (0x000efc1a000) at 0xf00ce000
> [ 6.772546] vmalloc: mapping page ef7f1320 (0x000efc19000) at 0xf00cf000
> [ 6.772548] vmalloc: mapping page ef7f1300 (0x000efc18000) at 0xf00d0000
> [ 6.772551] vmalloc: mapping page ef7f12e0 (0x000efc17000) at 0xf00d1000
> [ 6.822102] ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl F300)
> [ 6.850381] vmalloc: mapping page ef7f0420 (0x000efba1000) at 0xf00d3000
Here, we set up the mapping, which looks fine - it's apparently in the
range of physical addresses we expect for system memory.
> [ 6.857113] vmalloc: mapping page ef7f12c0 (0x000efc16000) at 0xf00d4000
> [ 6.863845] vmalloc: mapping page ef7f12a0 (0x000efc15000) at 0xf00d5000
> [ 6.870567] Unhandled fault: external abort on non-linefetch (0x808)
> at 0xf00d3018
Yet it causes this. I wonder if there's a conflict between DRAM and
some other devices causing this, or maybe a stale TLB entry.
The thing which makes me consider a stale TLB entry is that the mapping
we're adding is for a WBWA cacheable mapping, which should cause line
fetches. The abort which is being raised is for a non-linefetch, a
type of access which a WBWA cacheable mapping should never create.
We can check whether it's a stale TLB entry - if you add a call to
flush_tlb_all() after the call to vmalloc() in n_tty_open(). You
may need to include <asm/tlbflush.h> to make that work - can you try
that please.
Sorry it's needing soo much back-n-forth between us, I don't have
any Armada platforms which approach the size you have there. :(
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-11 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-10 16:54 [PATCH] n_tty: use kmalloc() instead of vmalloc() to avoid crash on armada-xp Stas Sergeev
2015-03-10 17:17 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-10 17:27 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-03-10 17:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-10 18:31 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-03-10 18:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-11 12:30 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-03-11 12:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2015-03-11 14:24 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-03-11 16:30 ` Peter Hurley
2015-03-11 16:39 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-03-12 12:33 ` Peter Hurley
2015-03-12 12:47 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-03-12 13:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-12 13:11 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-03-12 15:34 ` Vladimir Murzin
2015-03-12 12:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-10 17:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-10 17:35 ` Peter Hurley
2015-03-10 17:51 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-03-10 18:45 ` Peter Hurley
2015-03-11 12:44 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-03-11 12:57 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-03-11 13:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-11 14:33 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-03-11 15:01 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-03-11 15:13 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-03-11 15:22 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-03-12 13:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-11 16:52 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-03-11 17:26 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-03-11 17:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-11 17:56 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-03-11 18:11 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-03-11 18:38 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-03-11 18:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-11 18:08 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-03-11 18:33 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-03-12 12:44 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-03-12 12:47 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-03-12 13:03 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-03-12 13:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-12 13:16 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-03-12 13:55 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150311124730.GZ8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).