From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:35:50 +0100 Subject: Bug in i2c-core? In-Reply-To: <6018658.iFTJCkgHeH@avalon> References: <54F0507F.6030804@armadeus.com> <20150304082237.GA2955@katana> <20150308082617.GA1904@katana> <6018658.iFTJCkgHeH@avalon> Message-ID: <20150312093550.GB1000@katana> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > > > Adding Rob to CC as he wrote of_irq_get and put it into > > > platform_get_irq. Rob, we use of_irq_get() in the I2C core and the > > > question is now if we need to dispose the mapping and if so what would > > > be a good place for it so managed devices will not have their mappings > > > removed before the managed irq is removed. > > > > Ping. Just so you know: Without further information, I will revert the > > patch in question around rc4/rc5. I'd still like to know if the > > non-disposing of the mapping in platform_get_irq() is intentional. > > I'll defer that to Rob. I'm fine with the revert at the moment. Added the revert to for-current now with your and Dmitry's ack. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: