linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/10] drivers: PL011: avoid potential unregister_driver call
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:42:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150312104258.GI8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425491994-23913-2-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com>

On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 05:59:45PM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Although we care about not unregistering the driver if there are
> still ports connected during the .remove callback, we do miss this
> check in the pl011_probe function. So if the current port allocation
> fails, but there are other ports already registered, we will kill
> those.
> So factor out the port removal into a separate function and use that
> in the probe function, too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c |   38 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> index 92783fc..961f9b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> @@ -2235,6 +2235,24 @@ static int pl011_probe_dt_alias(int index, struct device *dev)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +/* unregisters the driver also if no more ports are left */
> +static void pl011_unregister_port(struct uart_amba_port *uap)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	bool busy = false;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(amba_ports); i++) {
> +		if (amba_ports[i] == uap)
> +			amba_ports[i] = NULL;
> +		else if (amba_ports[i])
> +			busy = true;
> +	}
> +	pl011_dma_remove(uap);
> +	if (!busy)
> +		uart_unregister_driver(&amba_reg);
> +}

This is still racy, as I pointed out at the time this crap was dreamt
up.

There is _no_ locking between an individual driver's ->probe or ->remove
functions being called concurrently for different devices.  The only
locking which the driver model guarantees is that a single struct device
can only be probed by one driver at a time.

Multiple struct device's can be in-progress of ->probe or ->remove
simultaneously.

However, this isn't your bug to solve... it's those who were proponents
of this crap approach.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-12 10:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-04 17:59 [PATCH v2 00/10] drivers: PL011: add ARM SBSA Generic UART support Andre Przywara
2015-03-04 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] drivers: PL011: avoid potential unregister_driver call Andre Przywara
2015-03-12 10:42   ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2015-04-08 15:39     ` Andre Przywara
2015-04-08 18:14       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-04 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] drivers: PL011: refactor pl011_startup() Andre Przywara
2015-03-04 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] drivers: PL011: refactor pl011_shutdown() Andre Przywara
2015-03-04 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] drivers: PL011: refactor pl011_set_termios() Andre Przywara
2015-03-04 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] drivers: PL011: refactor pl011_probe() Andre Przywara
2015-03-04 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] drivers: PL011: replace UART_MIS reading with _RIS & _IMSC Andre Przywara
2015-03-12 10:46   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-04 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] drivers: PL011: move cts_event workaround into separate function Andre Przywara
2015-03-07  3:00   ` Greg KH
2015-03-04 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] drivers: PL011: allow avoiding UART enabling/disabling Andre Przywara
2015-03-04 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] drivers: PL011: allow to supply fixed option string Andre Przywara
2015-03-04 17:59 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] drivers: PL011: add support for the ARM SBSA generic UART Andre Przywara
2015-03-09 15:59   ` Dave Martin
2015-03-12 10:52   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-12 13:43     ` Andre Przywara
2015-03-12 13:49       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-12 13:58         ` Andre Przywara
2015-03-07  3:01 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] drivers: PL011: add ARM SBSA Generic UART support Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150312104258.GI8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).