From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:18:18 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 7/7] common.c:105 Variable 'gephy' is never used. In-Reply-To: <20150313144840.GA7311@lunn.ch> References: <1426254264-5105-1-git-send-email-ameenali023@gmail.com> <20150313141926.GM8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20150313144840.GA7311@lunn.ch> Message-ID: <20150313151818.GO8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 03:48:40PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 02:19:26PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 03:44:24PM +0200, Ameen Ali wrote: > > > Variable 'gephy' is assigned a value that is never used. > > > > > > Signed-off-by : > > > --- > > > arch/arm/mach-dove/common.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-dove/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-dove/common.c > > > index 0d1a892..115a413 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-dove/common.c > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-dove/common.c > > > @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static void __init dove_clk_init(void) > > > orion_clkdev_add(NULL, "orion_spi.1", tclk); > > > orion_clkdev_add(NULL, "orion_wdt", tclk); > > > orion_clkdev_add(NULL, "mv64xxx_i2c.0", tclk); > > > - > > > + orion_clkdev_add(NULL,"mv643xx_eth_port.0",gephy); > > > > NAK. Just because some variable isn't read doesn't mean that you need > > to dream up some way to make it used. > > > > In any case, this is wrong because it will duplicate this entry: > > > > > orion_clkdev_add(NULL, "mv643xx_eth_port.0", ge); > > Hi Russell > > Missed that. Sorry. > > What happens in the DT world is that ge clock is a child of the gephy > clock, so that when you enable the ge clock, it walks up towards the > parent and enables the gephy clock. > > I don't see anything like this in the legacy Dove world. Are you just > relying on the bootloader turning on the phy and nothing turning it > off? See, this is why I hate these trivial patches - they waste people's time and create a load of unnecessary confusion where there's absolutely none needed. Here's the legacy code: gephy = dove_register_gate("gephy", "tclk", CLOCK_GATING_BIT_GIGA_PHY); Here, we have a gate controlled by the CLOCK_GATING_BIT_GIGA_PHY bit between the tclk, and gephy clock. This is immediately followed by: ge = dove_register_gate("ge", "gephy", CLOCK_GATING_BIT_GBE); which is a gate controlled by the CLOCK_GATING_BIT_GBE bit between the gephy clock and the ge clock. This second clock is then registered for use by the ethernet device: orion_clkdev_add(NULL, "mv643xx_eth_port.0", ge); If we look at clk_summary, we see: tclk 12 12 166666667 0 0 gephy 1 1 166666667 0 0 ge 1 1 166666667 0 0 which is the same relationship as in DT: tclk 13 13 166666667 0 0 gephy 1 1 166666667 0 0 ge 2 2 166666667 0 0 There is no problem here; this has been a complete waste of our time while we discuss this non-problem. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.