From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 8/8] arm64: enforce x1|x2|x3 == 0 upon kernel entry as per boot protocol
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 20:24:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150318202430.GA17417@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu-PX4cPz=yuFeRUbB3COc7jRvGuCYR7h_xLVuUv7A9CfA@mail.gmail.com>
> >> >>> ENTRY(stext)
> >> >>> + adr_l x8, boot_regs // record the contents of
> >> >>> + stp x0, x1, [x8] // x0 .. x3 at kernel entry
> >> >>> + stp x2, x3, [x8, #16]
> >> >>
> >> >> I think we should have a dc ivac here as we do for
> >> >> set_cpu_boot_mode_flag.
> >> >>
> >> >> That avoids a potential issue with boot_regs sharing a cacheline with
> >> >> data we write with the MMU on -- using __flush_dcache_area will result
> >> >> in a civac, so we could write back dirty data atop of the boot_regs if
> >> >> there were clean entries in the cache when we did the non-cacheable
> >> >> write.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Hmm, I wondered about that.
> >> >
> >> > Could we instead just make it u64 __initconst boot_regs[] in setup.c ?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Never mind, it's easier just to do the invalidate right after, and I
> >> can drop the flush before the access.
> >
> > Yup.
> >
> > Annoyingly the minimum cache line size seems to be a word (given the
> > defnition of CTR.DminLine), which means you need a few dc ivac
> > instructions to be architecturally correct.
> >
>
> But that applies to cpu_boot_mode as well then?
It writes a single word, so it happens to be safe.
> I will add a call to __inval_cache_range() right after recording the
> initial values, that should do the right thing regarding llinesize
That works, with one caveat: you'll need a dmb sy between the writes and
the call -- dc instructions by VA only hazard against normal cacheable
accesses, and __inval_cache_range assumes the caches are on and so
doesn't have a dmb prior to the dc instructions.
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-18 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-18 14:55 [PATCH v5 0/8] arm64: head.S cleanup Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 14:55 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] arm64: Get rid of struct cpu_table Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 16:11 ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-23 17:11 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-03-23 17:38 ` Will Deacon
2015-03-23 17:41 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-03-18 14:55 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] arm64: add macros for common adrp usages Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 17:54 ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-18 17:56 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 18:05 ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-18 18:06 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 14:55 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] arm64: remove processor_id Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 14:55 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] arm64: remove __switch_data object from head.S Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 14:55 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] arm64: use PC-relative reference for secondary_holding_pen_release Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 14:55 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] arm64: merge __enable_mmu and __turn_mmu_on Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 14:55 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] arm64: remove __calc_phys_offset Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 14:55 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] arm64: enforce x1|x2|x3 == 0 upon kernel entry as per boot protocol Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 18:13 ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-18 18:16 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 18:46 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 18:57 ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-18 19:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 20:24 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2015-03-19 7:30 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-19 10:35 ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-19 10:38 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-19 10:41 ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-19 11:00 ` [PATCH v3] " Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-19 13:36 ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-20 11:31 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-20 11:41 ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-20 11:45 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-20 12:25 ` Will Deacon
2015-03-20 12:50 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 22:26 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] " Peter Maydell
2015-03-18 18:23 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] arm64: head.S cleanup Mark Rutland
2015-03-18 18:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150318202430.GA17417@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox