From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi) Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 20:56:27 +0000 Subject: [PATCH V2 3/8] ARM64: cpuidle: Replace cpu_suspend by the common ARM/ARM64 function In-Reply-To: <1426704372-20406-4-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> References: <1426704372-20406-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <1426704372-20406-4-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20150321205627.GG22354@red-moon> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 06:46:07PM +0000, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > Call the common ARM/ARM64 'arm_cpuidle_suspend' instead of cpu_suspend function > which is specific to ARM64. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano > Acked-by: Kevin Hilman > Acked-by: Rob Herring I think that's ok even though I would like with this set to stop churning out arm64 cpuidle related functions renaming, so: Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi > --- > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm64.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm64.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm64.c > index 39a2c62..0cea244 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm64.c > +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm64.c > @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static int arm64_enter_idle_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev, > * call the CPU ops suspend protocol with idle index as a > * parameter. > */ > - ret = cpu_suspend(idx); > + arm_cpuidle_suspend(idx); > > cpu_pm_exit(); > } > -- > 1.9.1 > >