From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: relax Image placement requirement
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 10:45:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150323104536.GA9724@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427101646-465-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 09:07:23AM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> So as it turns out, the 512 MB alignment boundary restriction appears
> to have been introduced by accident when increasing the ID map to cover
> the entire kernel Image.
>
> So this reverts that change, by reducing the ID map to something that
> can never cross a 512 MB boundary by construction.
>
> Patch #1 removes some functions that are unused, so that I don't have
> to worry about them in patch #2
>
> Patch #2 introduces the reduced ID map, using a separate linker section
> that contains code the manipulates the state of the MMU.
>
> Patch #3 removes the sleep_idmap_phys global which always points to
> the ID map anyway
Patch 1 and 2 do not apply for me, what tree/commit are they based against ?
Please let me know so that I can give patch 3 a go.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
>
>
> Ard Biesheuvel (3):
> arm64: remove soft_restart() and friends
> arm64: reduce ID map to a single page
> arm64: drop sleep_idmap_phys
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu.h | 1 -
> arch/arm64/include/asm/proc-fns.h | 3 ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h | 1 -
> arch/arm64/kernel/head.S | 13 +++++++------
> arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 12 +-----------
> arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S | 9 ++++-----
> arch/arm64/kernel/suspend.c | 3 ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 11 ++++++++++-
> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 11 -----------
> arch/arm64/mm/proc.S | 33 ---------------------------------
> 10 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.8.3.2
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-23 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-20 17:02 [PATCH] arm64: relax Image placement requirement Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-20 17:49 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-22 15:36 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-23 9:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] " Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-23 9:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: remove soft_restart() and friends Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-23 9:32 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-23 9:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: reduce ID map to a single page Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-23 9:07 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: drop sleep_idmap_phys Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-23 15:58 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-03-23 16:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-23 10:45 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2015-03-23 10:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: relax Image placement requirement Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150323104536.GA9724@red-moon \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).