linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/8] arm64: Get rid of struct cpu_table
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 17:38:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150323173821.GD1556@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55104926.1060901@arm.com>

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 05:11:02PM +0000, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> On 18/03/15 14:55, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > @@ -209,22 +207,12 @@ static void __init smp_build_mpidr_hash(void)
> >
> >   static void __init setup_processor(void)
> >   {
> > -       struct cpu_info *cpu_info;
> >          u64 features, block;
> >          u32 cwg;
> >          int cls;
> >
> > -       cpu_info = lookup_processor_type(read_cpuid_id());
> > -       if (!cpu_info) {
> > -               printk("CPU configuration botched (ID %08x), unable to continue.\n",
> > -                      read_cpuid_id());
> > -               while (1);
> > -       }
> > -
> > -       cpu_name = cpu_info->cpu_name;
> > -
> > -       printk("CPU: %s [%08x] revision %d\n",
> > -              cpu_name, read_cpuid_id(), read_cpuid_id() & 15);
> > +       printk("CPU: AArch64 Processor [%08x] revision %d\n",
> > +              read_cpuid_id(), read_cpuid_id() & 15);
> >
> 
> While we are at it, does it make sense to change
> 
>   s/CPU/Boot CPU/
> 
> to make it clear on a big.Little system ?

This is already queued, so I don't think it's worth the effort now.

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-23 17:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-18 14:55 [PATCH v5 0/8] arm64: head.S cleanup Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 14:55 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] arm64: Get rid of struct cpu_table Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 16:11   ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-23 17:11   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-03-23 17:38     ` Will Deacon [this message]
2015-03-23 17:41       ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-03-18 14:55 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] arm64: add macros for common adrp usages Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 17:54   ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-18 17:56     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 18:05       ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-18 18:06         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 14:55 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] arm64: remove processor_id Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 14:55 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] arm64: remove __switch_data object from head.S Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 14:55 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] arm64: use PC-relative reference for secondary_holding_pen_release Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 14:55 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] arm64: merge __enable_mmu and __turn_mmu_on Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 14:55 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] arm64: remove __calc_phys_offset Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 14:55 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] arm64: enforce x1|x2|x3 == 0 upon kernel entry as per boot protocol Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 18:13   ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-18 18:16     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 18:46       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 18:57         ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-18 19:55           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 20:24             ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-19  7:30               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-19 10:35                 ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-19 10:38                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-19 10:41                     ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-19 11:00                       ` [PATCH v3] " Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-19 13:36                         ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-20 11:31                           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-20 11:41                             ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-20 11:45                               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-20 12:25                                 ` Will Deacon
2015-03-20 12:50                                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 22:26           ` [PATCH v5 8/8] " Peter Maydell
2015-03-18 18:23 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] arm64: head.S cleanup Mark Rutland
2015-03-18 18:28   ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150323173821.GD1556@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).