From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: edubezval@gmail.com (Eduardo Valentin) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:53:57 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: exynos: allow build for !THERMAL or !CPU_THERMAL cases In-Reply-To: <2275232.48muFcOOQv@amdc1032> References: <2275232.48muFcOOQv@amdc1032> Message-ID: <20150324145355.GA29155@developer.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:20:22PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > Allow driver build for !THERMAL or !CPU_THERMAL cases. > > The new dependency rule is the same as the one that CPUFREQ_DT > option has (for cpufreq-dt driver which has the same issue with > using of_cpufreq_cooling_register()). > > Cc: Kukjin Kim > Cc: Arnd Bergmann > Cc: Eduardo Valentin > Cc: Lukasz Majewski > Fixes: 8b2b4a4e5366 ("cpufreq: exynos: allow modular build") > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin > --- > drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm > index 1b06fc4..f4df4af3 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm > @@ -28,7 +28,8 @@ config ARM_VEXPRESS_SPC_CPUFREQ > config ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ > tristate "SAMSUNG EXYNOS CPUfreq Driver" > depends on CPU_EXYNOS4210 || SOC_EXYNOS4212 || SOC_EXYNOS4412 || SOC_EXYNOS5250 > - depends on THERMAL > + # if CPU_THERMAL is on and THERMAL=m, ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ cannot be =y: > + depends on !CPU_THERMAL || THERMAL > help > This adds the CPUFreq driver for Samsung EXYNOS platforms. > Supported SoC versions are: > -- > 1.8.2.3 > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: